Does going over Jericho help superstars any more?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Does going over Jericho mean anything?

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 44.4%
  • No

    Votes: 10 55.6%

  • Total voters
    18

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Got into a debate with George about it, and thought I'd make a poll. Curious to see if anyone thinks it does.

Personally, I think not. I forget all the people Jericho has jobbed to, and everyone knows - with Fozzy - that he isn't committed enough to create any threat to any credible star, and the fact that he constantly loses just doesn't give anyone a rub. The Fandango win at Wrestlemania was billed as a fluke, and Jericho actually beat him the next PPV convincingly did he not? Did Fandango get any rub because of that? Nope. Fandango was over due to the awesome crowd deciding to sing his very catchy song - that's it. In my opinion of course.

Anyway, does going over Jericho mean anything any more? Please vote.
 

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
To actually be 'put over' by somebody the win has to be something of a surprise, or at least an 'upset'. Sheamus and Randy Orton effectively put over D-Bry because going by the booking of them compared to Bryan, you would expect them to win. With Jericho you know him losing is an absolute inevitability in a lot of cases, so you don't have that same reaction you would in other cases e.g The Shield beating Ryback, Sheamus and Cena, which IMO was one of the best examples of putting people over in the last year.

One thing I will give Jericho is that he probably helped RVD, since he hasn't competed in WWE for 6 years it shows he 'still has it' and that he can work a 20 minute match and win. But it still doesn't make you feel like RVD is anything but an upper-midcarder.
 

Pop Tatari

Christian vieri
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
4,092
Reaction score
2,137
Points
113
Location
London, United Kingdom
Maybe for guys like Fandango and that level but for anyone above that then no.Jericho is someone who loses all his big matches so its no big deal. Did his feud with Ziggler really put ziggler over? I say no
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC4Life37

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
To smarks, probably not, except with a newcomer like Fandango. To casuals it probably still carries some value to see a guy go over Y2J.

Did it help Ryback any? I don't think Ryback winning a triple threat math with Hulk Hogan and The Rock would help him at this point. He has been booked straight to hell.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Somewhat. When the guy is a new comer or someone really low on the card it helps. But for guys like RVD for example, yeah, no.
 

CM Punk

AJ Styles
Champion
Joined
Dec 27, 2011
Messages
32,441
Reaction score
6,128
Points
118
Location
Ontario, Canada
It depends how he is booked and what story is told. I believe he put over Fandango but his injury fucked him over.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
It's one win more. It's like those guys that Ryback faced before facing the new guys.

Yea a win against Jericho is the equivalent to beating a nameless jobber. Brilliant.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Right now that's what I think tbh. He was a great wrestler in the past and I believe he's still that great but WWE isn't using him correctly.


They are using him correctly. Jericho does so much outside of the WWE (TV, music etc) that he just doesn't have the time to commit to a real full time schedule. You don't give big pushes or title reigns to guys that aren't there all the time unless they are a big deal like the Rock or Austin.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Right now that's what I think tbh. He was a great wrestler in the past and I believe he's still that great but WWE isn't using him correctly.


You are just wrong then, no two ways about it. For instance say Heath Slater came out tonight at the SD taping and beat Jericho cleanly 1,2,3. You think nobody would bat an eye? bullshit
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Dolph's hits bullseye.

Jericho due to his limited schedule (he's there for like 6 months, then gone) means you cannot push him to the top, so logically he would lose to the guys they are pushing to the top. If a lower carder/younger talent beats him it will still benefit him.
 

Nano

The Game
Technician
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
540
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Website
www.pheed.com
They are using him correctly. Jericho does so much outside of the WWE (TV, music etc) that he just doesn't have the time to commit to a real full time schedule. You don't give big pushes or title reigns to guys that aren't there all the time unless they are a big deal like the Rock or Austin.
I know, but everyoneis defeating him at the PPVs, doesn't make sense to me because he's a great wrestler.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
I know, but everyoneis defeating him at the PPVs, doesn't make sense to me because he's a great wrestler.

Actual ring talent doesn't always equal winning at the ppv. Jericho is doing what a wrestler in his 40's with a long career should be doing. Putting over talent.
What benefit would there be to Jericho, who is as stated over 40 years old and working a limited schedule going over younger talent who is going to be there in the long run if they aren't going to put a belt on Jericho or push him to the top anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC4Life37

Nano

The Game
Technician
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
540
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Website
www.pheed.com
You are just wrong then, no two ways about it. For instance say Heath Slater came out tonight at the SD taping and beat Jericho cleanly 1,2,3. You think nobody would bat an eye? bullshit
I wouldn't really care because he's losing to everyone. As Alkaline said, it's a logic thing if they make him lose to people who will be pushed, but he's losing to everyone...