- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
Got into a debate with George about it, and thought I'd make a poll. Curious to see if anyone thinks it does.
Personally, I think not. I forget all the people Jericho has jobbed to, and everyone knows - with Fozzy - that he isn't committed enough to create any threat to any credible star, and the fact that he constantly loses just doesn't give anyone a rub. The Fandango win at Wrestlemania was billed as a fluke, and Jericho actually beat him the next PPV convincingly did he not? Did Fandango get any rub because of that? Nope. Fandango was over due to the awesome crowd deciding to sing his very catchy song - that's it. In my opinion of course.
Anyway, does going over Jericho mean anything any more? Please vote.
Personally, I think not. I forget all the people Jericho has jobbed to, and everyone knows - with Fozzy - that he isn't committed enough to create any threat to any credible star, and the fact that he constantly loses just doesn't give anyone a rub. The Fandango win at Wrestlemania was billed as a fluke, and Jericho actually beat him the next PPV convincingly did he not? Did Fandango get any rub because of that? Nope. Fandango was over due to the awesome crowd deciding to sing his very catchy song - that's it. In my opinion of course.
Anyway, does going over Jericho mean anything any more? Please vote.