Do you think the WWE needs to replace all the PPV shows named after gimmick matches?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Gman003

The Lunatic Fringe
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
658
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Ontario, Canada
Yes agree with that too @Beaver and I've been saying it since the split.

But a buddy made a decent point. If they did that, then that's 2 months between ppvs and rivalries could get real stale.
I can see what he's saying, but I still think it's the better option. I think I'm going to stick to smackdown only for a bit. Just so that way it's only 1 ppv but still every month. Not every 2 weeks. Although by the time rumble gets here that'll be a decent stretch with no ppv. Kinda surprised they didn't have a 'network special' in between somewhere lol
 

Jazzwazza

Jobber
Joined
Dec 14, 2016
Messages
39
Reaction score
19
Points
0
Age
31
Location
AU
I don't like the gimmick ppvs I enjoyed the old days when these matches were special and only used at appropriate times. It feels way too forced and takes the shine off the gimmick matches cause we see them so often now
 

Prince Bálor

I'm kind of a big deal
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
24,384
Reaction score
6,635
Points
0
Location
Serbia
Yeah, HIAC and TLC can hit the road as far as I'm concerned.