Do you think that WWE had Brock sell that Knee Injury against HHH at E.Rules as a to write him off TV?
Fuck no..
Brock will be back in no time..
New contract, more appearances.. Why keep him off?
Ryback ? Reigns?Okay *grunt* I dominate match *grunt* get sympathy walk *snort* then Bork off TV *growl* and I do job *uhh*
Actually Vickie Guerrero revealed the week after Brock returned to TV that she had signed him to a contract. So in kayfabe he is hired.Just a way for Triple H to have something that he can hold over Brock, I suppose... Being able to say he left Brock barely able to stand on his own without assistance, perhaps? Similar to the claim he had over Undertaker after WM27, where he pointed out it was the first time Taker couldn't stand on his own after a WM bout.
Brock doesn't really need a reason to go away. Kayfabe wise, he isn't even employed by WWE. He's been fired since this time last year and only returned to battle Triple H because the latter wanted revenge for his broken arm, then the feud was rekindled this year when Brock attacked Vince because he was in the process of firing Paul Heyman. If his beef with HHH is over, Lesnar has no reason to stick around speaking strictly storyline wise.
uh his new contract is like old one dude.
Before you go any further, remember both of you are basing your arguments off of shit you read on dirt sheets and neither of you have any idea if you are right or wrong.Not really, his new contract allows him to do more appearances as on RAW or SD.
Before you go any further, remember both of you are basing your arguments off of shit you read on dirt sheets and neither of you have any idea if you are right or wrong.
Well, coming from a point where we've seen Brock on several RAW's already convinces me that he has a different contract.
We saw Brock on several Raw's leading up to ER last year, silly.