Do you agree with this?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
A Spanish analyst for the Classico has just said this about a late Barcelona penalty appeal:

"There is no contact, but Sergio Ramos intends to hit him. So on paper, it is a penalty"

Basically, the Barcelona player dived, Sergio Ramos did apparently "try" to kick him over and because of that it is a penalty. If that doesn't sum up La Liga I don't know what does. Do you agree with that ideology?
 

Saylor

Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
193
Points
63
Age
29
Website
www.wweforums.net
No, I don't. It's the same as thinking of killing someone, but he dies and you're punished for it. Unless physical contact is made it shouldn't be a penalty, while he did intend to make contact he didn't, so he should not be penalized.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
31
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
Should I be on a murder charge if I intend to shoot you but I left my gun at home? It's an exaggerated example admittedly but without the action how can you punish the act? The player isn't effected by intent, if so how long is it until people are booked for dirty looks?
 

Nano

The Game
Technician
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
540
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Website
www.pheed.com
Saylor said:
No, I don't. It's the same as thinking of killing someone, but he dies and you're punished for it. Unless physical contact is made it shouldn't be a penalty, while he did intend to make contact he didn't, so he should not be penalized.

^This.

I think it won't be penalty if he doesn't go for him, also the Barcelona players have a lot of theater classes behind them, not all of them show their actor skills but other do that every second of their life, example Dani Alves :pipebomb:
 

BaraaKhalaf92

Champion
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
122
Points
0
Age
32
Of course I don't, that was not a penalty. Finally, a referee who doesn't give those bastards what they want when they want. :please:
 

Robbie Coletrain

Big Robbie
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
5,646
Reaction score
505
Points
0
Age
30
No I don't, but I see where he is coming from, I mean if in a football match, a player tried to full on punch another player, but misses, should he still be punished for it, I believe they should as he tried to do it, and you see fouls and even bookings being given when there wasn't any contact simply because if there was contact, it could have been a very dangerous challenge. So no, in this case I don't agree as the challenge wouldn't have been dangerous if it had connected, but if it could have caused damage and they don't connect, then I think a punishment should be handed out.