This is a question that arose after watching No Mercy 08 - Trips V Hardy.
With all the latest commotion over Edge being new champion, and what everyone thinks should be the WM25 ME, people all seem to feel that Jeff Hardy is not ME quality. No I'm not completely convinced that he's not ME quality, but this is the question...
WM23 Ken Kennedy won the MiTB contract and declared that he would go to WM24 and challenge the champion - so we had our WM24 main event set in stone! It was going to be Ken Kennedy going into Mania and (95% of) winning the championship! So what is the difference between Ken Kennedy, of 2007 and Jeff Hardy of 2008?
Mr Kennedy, at that point had his share of fueds with big names, and was going to be pushed into WM24 as a heel to win the title.
Jeff Hardy has been going after the WWE Title since, pretty much, Royal Rumble 07! He's been on the tip of winning the title and come so close several times; both against Trips and Orton. The roof was blown off the arena at Survivor Series this year when he made his run in.
So what exactly made everyone feel comfortable with Mr Kennedy going into Wrestlemania 24 to win the title, when you don't want Jeff Hardy going into a title match (not even a 1V1 match...)?
Jeff Hardy is fucking over with the crowd, you cannot argue that. He's been pushed hard over the last couple of months, where has WWE gone wrong that you don't feel he is Mania ME material?
Kennedy came out of some fueds on RAW and SD against some big names, HBK and Taker popping into mind, and came out both of those with overall losses - he was, and this is my personal opinion, stale and getting worse, and kept getting injured (atmiddley not the best point to bring up, i know).
With all the latest commotion over Edge being new champion, and what everyone thinks should be the WM25 ME, people all seem to feel that Jeff Hardy is not ME quality. No I'm not completely convinced that he's not ME quality, but this is the question...
WM23 Ken Kennedy won the MiTB contract and declared that he would go to WM24 and challenge the champion - so we had our WM24 main event set in stone! It was going to be Ken Kennedy going into Mania and (95% of) winning the championship! So what is the difference between Ken Kennedy, of 2007 and Jeff Hardy of 2008?
Mr Kennedy, at that point had his share of fueds with big names, and was going to be pushed into WM24 as a heel to win the title.
Jeff Hardy has been going after the WWE Title since, pretty much, Royal Rumble 07! He's been on the tip of winning the title and come so close several times; both against Trips and Orton. The roof was blown off the arena at Survivor Series this year when he made his run in.
So what exactly made everyone feel comfortable with Mr Kennedy going into Wrestlemania 24 to win the title, when you don't want Jeff Hardy going into a title match (not even a 1V1 match...)?
Jeff Hardy is fucking over with the crowd, you cannot argue that. He's been pushed hard over the last couple of months, where has WWE gone wrong that you don't feel he is Mania ME material?
Kennedy came out of some fueds on RAW and SD against some big names, HBK and Taker popping into mind, and came out both of those with overall losses - he was, and this is my personal opinion, stale and getting worse, and kept getting injured (atmiddley not the best point to bring up, i know).