Did you guys know Undertaker want Roman Reigns to end The Streak

[Deadmanforever97]

When I read this I said "if he was a heel sooner and/or the Tribal Chief sooner then yes"

But they gave that accomplishment away.

I feel this would have been better route.

https://www.thesportster.com/news/report-why-brock-lesnar-ended-the-streak-over-roman-reigns/

What are your opinions

 

[Redboy123@]

If he did it in 2015 it would be a disaster. Same with 2016 and by that point Undertaker was done. So maybe it was a good idea to do it in 2014. That was the year to do it so give since credit and I see his logic of giving it to Brock as it creates a big heel for Roman to defeat. But Roman was just rejected by the crowd to the extreme. So it was a tricky situation.

 

[Deadmanforever97]

If he did it in 2015 it would be a disaster. Same with 2016 and by that point Undertaker was done. So maybe it was a good idea to do it in 2014. That was the year to do it so give since credit and I see his logic of giving it to Brock as it creates a big heel for Roman to defeat. But Roman was just rejected by the crowd to the extreme. So it was a tricky situation.

To me personally the only reason Vince gave the streak to Lesnar was because he needed a reason to put Brock in the Hall of Fame once he was done with wrestling. Also he wanted him to stay in WWE.

You see there was talk of Randy Orton ending The Streak as The Legend Killer.

But I believe in 2014 after RR you could have made Roman Reigns than the "Big Dog"

Also Kane even agreed on the Undertaker's comments

 

[Redboy123@]

To me personally the only reason Vince gave the streak to Lesnar was because he needed a reason to put Brock in the Hall of Fame once he was done with wrestling. Also he wanted him to stay in WWE.

You see there was talk of Randy Orton ending The Streak as The Legend Killer.

But I believe in 2014 after RR you could have made Roman Reigns than the "Big Dog"

Also Kane even agreed on the Undertaker's comments

Lesnar was already a bonefied hof prior to his 2nd run. And that's me pretending the wwe hot is a legit hof. He didn't need to win to prove anything. Already a multiple time champion and would go on to main event many more ppvs and win many more world titles. Sole reason the gave the win to kesnar was to get roman over in the long run.

 

[Deadmanforever97]

Lesnar was already a bonefied hof prior to his 2nd run. And that's me pretending the wwe hot is a legit hof. He didn't need to win to prove anything. Already a multiple time champion and would go on to main event many more ppvs and win many more world titles. Sole reason the gave the win to kesnar was to get roman over in the long run.

Well truly I don't think they needed Brock to put Roman over.

If Roman would have ended The Streak as a heel he would have been Over like Rover.

But I do get what you're saying he needed a catapult into success.

I just wish they used Undertaker as the way to Roman success story instead using Brock Lesnar as a way to put Reigns over.

I bet nobody remembers when Roman beat Lesnar at Summer Slam.

 

[Redboy123@]

Well truly I don't think they needed Brock to put Roman over.

If Roman would have ended The Streak as a heel he would have been Over like Rover.

But I do get what you're saying he needed a catapult into success.

I just wish they used Undertaker as the way to Roman success story instead using Brock Lesnar as a way to put Reigns over.

I bet nobody remembers when Roman beat Lesnar at Summer Slam.

Yeah roman beating taker as a heel is a great idea. Romans promo on the raw after mania 33 is where he should of turned heel. But they are so adamant with Roman being a face that unfortunately it didn't happen. And I think only a heel could beat the streak. Can't be having no face winning unless you want them to get booed.

I still see the logic of block beating the streak and being a massive monster heel only for him to lose at the next mania. That's some biblical storytelling. In the year 2015 I think everyone would of been on board with Bryan beating Brock at mania 31. Then again mania 31 had the last great mania main event so it's not keeping me up at night.

I'm a firm believer that undertaker should of retired at wrestle mania 30. I didn't mind 31 32 and 33 (33 was a sad match but good ending to his career). I just think his legacy has really diminished the last 5 years.

 

[Jacob Fox]

Roman ending the Streak as a heel would have been the perfect way to end the Streak, I don't pretend that it would make me like Roman any more than I do right now, but it would have made a lot more sense to me than Brock doing it.

I mean, at the time, we were all talking about Brock ending the Streak so Roman then could beat Brock and get a rub from the Streak that way. I suppose that was the way they were going because they wanted Roman over as a face.

Roman currently is proving how much better a heel he is.

 

[InsaneAlphaBeta]

I dont know about Roman Reigns, but in my perfect world The Fiend would have broken the streak. The Fiend would have been perfect for countless reasons.

 

[Deadmanforever97]

Roman ending the Streak as a heel would have been the perfect way to end the Streak, I don't pretend that it would make me like Roman any more than I do right now, but it would have made a lot more sense to me than Brock doing it.

I mean, at the time, we were all talking about Brock ending the Streak so Roman then could beat Brock and get a rub from the Streak that way. I suppose that was the way they were going because they wanted Roman over as a face.

Roman currently is proving how much better a heel he is.

I Believe if Roman would have beat Taker he wouldn't have gotten a concussion.

I also believe Roman would be on his way to be bigger than John Cena.

I hope he faces The Rock so he can add Triple H, Rock, Undertaker to his WM record.

They should have saved John Cena vs Roman Reigns for WrestleMania

 

[edge4ever]

Brock ending the streak: literally pointless as he is an established badass and is beyond believable

Roman ending the streak, hopefully turning heel with the win: mega heat.... insane draw... yeah, see Roman now and imagine if he would’ve had the same character after ending the streak... yeah, amazing.

 

[Lady Deathbane]

All I know is, giving the streak to Bork Laser was the biggest waste and absolutely pointless. I may be biased because I really hate Bork, but I'm pretty sure the common consensus is still that it was a bad decision.

Tbh, even Cena woulda' been a better candidate. If anyone remembers the very first time Cena premiered, Taker was passing by Cena in the hallway after Cena's first match and congratulated him and gave him props "as a rookie."

 

[Redboy123@]

2014 was the year to do it. So maybe it should of been bray

 

[Deadmanforever97]

As much as it benefit Brock, I'm pretty sure we all agree that there were many other candidates to end Undertaker's streak.

Vince didn't give Taker much of a chance to change his mind on the streak.

https://youtu.be/7M9zFXyy4i4

With that being the most controversial and stupid mistake till this day. Not letting someone else more deserving end the streak or don't at all

 

[edge4ever]

2014 was the year to do it. So maybe it should of been bray

I said this before too. Instead of it being Brock and then having bray lose to taker the following year, have bray fight him instead and beat him. It would be earth shattering and make bray the minister of darkness or whatever.

 

[Redboy123@]

I said this before too. Instead of it being Brock and then having bray lose to taker the following year, have bray fight him instead and beat him. It would be earth shattering and make bray the minister of darkness or whatever.

It would if made sense and the timing works out. I don't blame them wanting to do Brock vs Taker tho and can see the logic to Brock beating the streak but it didn't work out and was executed very poorly. Seth cashing in on Brock instead if Roman winning the title at wrestle mania 31 is all you need to know really