The problem with WWE is who is running the show - Vince is out of touch with the times.
When he does give us more wrestling, its mostly cookie cutter, often stale watered down stuff with maybe some good to great stuff mixed in at times. That sums up the last couple years. A lot of nonsense with only a few memorable matches that will make the rewatch collection.
I can't say the same about before that. From 2000 to 2003 or so for example, there are more WWE matches I want to rewatch than I have time for. 2006-2008, I could rewatch the really good ones in a couple days, maybe half a week if I stretched the viewing of them out.
Get with the times Vince, we don't need past era's remade. We need a new era. An era with ROH styled in ring work - people being let to cut loose and not held back to conform to your "story style" that only sometimes works really well. Give us better characters we can care about and storylines that are interesting. You did it before, do it again or find someone who can.
One of the things I see wrong is - Vince likes having fun and too often - at his products expense.
Why does Khali get these small to big pushes? Why does Trips remain on top? Why do so many talents get watered down ring work wise? Why do we see silly storylines? Why did the title matches build for WM23 take a backseat to McMahon vs. Trump? Why did Vince want to revolve summer 2007 around his "death" until the real Benoit family deaths occured?
Answer: Because he wanted to have fun seeing what he likes to see on his show - not his audience. In turn, ratings went down.
I do think, in general the industry isn't at its bes right now. TNA has good wrestling, they just need to replace Russo. ROH has great wrestling but needs more exposure. WWE has a great roster, they just need a new direction and to start building new stars. They took the risk in 1996 and 1997 when they had neck to neck competition. Now they don't have that and they don't even want to take a risk with the ratings. It can't get much worse if they try something different?
I'd take a month of "best of" shows if they'd give everyone a month off and had creative sit down and worked up a new, fresh and exciting approach for fans to come back to.
When he does give us more wrestling, its mostly cookie cutter, often stale watered down stuff with maybe some good to great stuff mixed in at times. That sums up the last couple years. A lot of nonsense with only a few memorable matches that will make the rewatch collection.
I can't say the same about before that. From 2000 to 2003 or so for example, there are more WWE matches I want to rewatch than I have time for. 2006-2008, I could rewatch the really good ones in a couple days, maybe half a week if I stretched the viewing of them out.
Get with the times Vince, we don't need past era's remade. We need a new era. An era with ROH styled in ring work - people being let to cut loose and not held back to conform to your "story style" that only sometimes works really well. Give us better characters we can care about and storylines that are interesting. You did it before, do it again or find someone who can.
One of the things I see wrong is - Vince likes having fun and too often - at his products expense.
Why does Khali get these small to big pushes? Why does Trips remain on top? Why do so many talents get watered down ring work wise? Why do we see silly storylines? Why did the title matches build for WM23 take a backseat to McMahon vs. Trump? Why did Vince want to revolve summer 2007 around his "death" until the real Benoit family deaths occured?
Answer: Because he wanted to have fun seeing what he likes to see on his show - not his audience. In turn, ratings went down.
I do think, in general the industry isn't at its bes right now. TNA has good wrestling, they just need to replace Russo. ROH has great wrestling but needs more exposure. WWE has a great roster, they just need a new direction and to start building new stars. They took the risk in 1996 and 1997 when they had neck to neck competition. Now they don't have that and they don't even want to take a risk with the ratings. It can't get much worse if they try something different?
I'd take a month of "best of" shows if they'd give everyone a month off and had creative sit down and worked up a new, fresh and exciting approach for fans to come back to.