CT Styles' Section Rant

[THE Renegade Diesel]

Haven't thought of that honestly. Really original point, but the thing with me is when reading long matches. I have to be really into it. If not then I tend to forget what had just happened, and in the next line or so we have someone going through a table off the entrance when I thought I was reading action in the ring. Shorter writing is much more effective, and it doesn't mesh you're brain up half as much.

 

[CT Styles]

Seeing how most of the people concur Anigma and I are overrated and our latest shows got few reviews, I truly fail to see the cocksucking you are talking about.

Lately, who has got consistent reviews?

I remember seeing Anigma comment in someone's thread and they'll rep him saying something like it's an honor to get comments from someone as legendary as you.. etc. I'm sure I did it when I first started but you soon realize some things are just stupid.

BTW, I'll be going more in depth with Version 2.0/Part 2.

 

[THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps]

Considering only two or three of us on this forum actually read y2j's stuff CMS, you're way off target there.

No mention of moi = no ratings.

 

[CT Styles]

No mention of moi = no ratings.

Remember.. part 2.

CMS, you've always been complaining that no one reads his stuff and that you only review it.

 

[comicgeekelly]

Why is this site so obsessed with length and size?!

I feel like a 5th grader right now, but I laughed when I saw that.

Overall good rant, you brought up some good points. I'm really starting to think that I should check out y2j__legend's stuff.

 

[xtremebadass]

Why is this site so obsessed with length and size?!

hehe I just got that now. lol, that's gold.