- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 178,066
- Reaction score
- 37,288
- Points
- 148
- Age
- 38
- Location
- Wrestling Forums
- Website
- wrestlingsmarks.com
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
My point is if he was doing that the talent HAD to have been aware already and didn't care or he just wasn't doing that.Is that the only thing allowed to be accused of though? If they're arguing that he unfairly held down women or was otherwise sexist despite not sexually assaulting them, is that just dismissable as nothing?
And I was mainly talking about how you named two things as the only options and the conclusion of both of them were that the allegations didn't matter
If Mike was a shitty person doing shitty things it seeps into most interactions his talent already knew about.
So they quit over the media backlash and not Mike being a shitty person.
And yes, I don't think this hashtag should be for cancelling people and whole ass feds because he's a shitty person.
The whole wrestling is a house of cards and it's gonna fall don if that's how low the bar is now. Wrestlers are generally shitty people.
Vince McMahon is probably the shittiest person ever. You ready for that house to come down?