I obviously know more than you if you think Reach is the best game.
I don't think it's the best game ever made, I just think it's the best HALO game, don't put words in my mouth.
Are you actually joking? What was better on World at War than 4? "OOOOH ZOMBIES!!!!"
This is an absolute AdaComment.
@Crayo
well it was better, the multiplayer was pretty much a carbon copy of CoD 4. The game had limbs being able to be blown off, Co-op campaign, Hidden easter eggs in the single player, Zombies, tanks, more gamemodes online.
I mean do I need to continue? because if that isn't enough for you then I give up. It's basically CoD4 but with more things. It's like if I say WAW is better than COD4, it's like i'm saying that COD4 is shit. Well if that's what you think then no, I enjoy playing COD4 and it is my favourite, but WAW was just better.
Halo 2 was the first one to implement online play. It included 3 shots to the head kills, and was mostly based on better players being able to win the majority of the time. halo reach was a different idea but Halo 4 > reach before any updates were implemented.
Now again, don't confuse me with hating the other games, I own and have played every Halo game that's been released. I like all of them, but 4 felt more like Call of Duty than Halo. The whole Killstreak thing irked me, the game didn't need it, don't get me started on the size of those maps, small as shit. Whilst I do enjoy all the Halo series, Bungie reached the pinnacle of an all round good Halo game by Reach. The story had memorable characters, a customisable character for Campaign/Multiplayer, Armor Abilities, good story, good choice of playlists, a better forge than Halo 3. I'm by no means saying that Halo 1/2/3 were ever bad games, but I feel that Reach was when they perfected the formula as best as they could.