- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
KLockard23 said:Rock/Brock II is more appealing than Brock/HHH II or Rock/Cena II.
To you.
KLockard23 said:Rock/Brock II is more appealing than Brock/HHH II or Rock/Cena II.
seabs said:Wasn't it the first time at Summerslam? I have a hazy mind.
Senhor Perfect said:Lots of times in the early 2000s, for example:
[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=XCa3Sx9i8aU[/video]
[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=v7R8qyeLwLI[/video]
Crayo said:To you.
KLockard23 said:So you'd rather see the other two over Rock/Brock? Objectively, it would definitely outdraw Brock/HHH II and maybe even a Cena/Rock rematch as well.
seabs said:Neither were 1 on 1
Crayo said:No, I presumed you meant in general it would be more appealing and more successful. I would prefer Rock/Brock over those two but I wouldn't really care about Rock/Brock either... It's something we have seen in the past numerous times headlining the present, I don't care about those, they're not the future of WWE.
I highly highly doubt Rock/Brock would be close to how successful Rock/Cena would be (and has been).
seabs said:Buried? Really?
Crayo said:Not buried, but if you were told before Lesnar returned that they were thinking of having Lesnar return, lose to Cena in his first month, beat HHH but then lose to him again at WM would you have been as excited as you were when he first came back? I think it's been a tragic waste of a fantastic talent and opportunity. I understand the need to set up dream matches to sell big PPV's, but use his appearances wisely and you could have had both.