Not really noI do think he’s scum and I plan to, but I also don’t think it’s helpful having 100 posts of this each day phase. You don’t think it’s distracting and makes it easier for scum?
Not really noI do think he’s scum and I plan to, but I also don’t think it’s helpful having 100 posts of this each day phase. You don’t think it’s distracting and makes it easier for scum?
This i agree with, i much rather not play a game of either or, n i also dont think ive misbehaved. Im also pretty solid town imo here so id advise ppl to judge ekko based on his posts rather than to potentially shut him up, as much as that would soothe my ears. I think using an either or logic would be a bit of a mistake because of course, i could have a bad read n ekko is also town, as u pointed out. Which ive never said is impossible either just so im clear!Of course it can if we agree they’re both town. If you think Ekko is scum then push him but don’t push stuff like “this game can’t survive with them tunnelling each other” because of course it can. I’m not about to lynch either of them when I’m pretty hard town on both as it stands
OK, agree to disagree, then.Not really no
Well i think at the very least it makes it easy for scum to vote ekko , we can agree here?Not really no
I think what smark is saying is what makes it easier for scum to vote Ekko. If he paints it that way then it’s very easy to be like ok well I have Jeff as town and Ekko is annoying, let’s kill himWell i think at the very least it makes it easy for scum to vote ekko , we can agree here?
I’m not worried about Jeff as he'll vote for the good of the group, but Ekko is the one who keeps saying we have to remove Jeff now. Don’t see him playing for the benefit of town, but if you guys don’t agree, I’m fine skimming the thread.I don’t wanna get it bogged down into we have to lynch Ekko because he’s posting too much and Jeff thinks he’s scum and won’t drop it
there’s so many other options to consider lol
Yah last sentence is key. Its why i didnt browbeat his lynch yesterday, i want ppl to be held accountable for their votes. I made my point clear up to others to chooseI think what smark is saying is what makes it easier for scum to vote Ekko. If he paints it that way then it’s very easy to be like ok well I have Jeff as town and Ekko is annoying, let’s kill him
i think just letting you two go at it and if people wanna vote along with you then they have to tell us why they think he’s scum is >>>>
I'm not even talking about Ekko, I'm just saying you're following a bad science pathThere’s a difference between playing badly or playing scummy and outright going out of your way to say stuff you know is gonna be flagged for being anti town. As scum you think about that sort of thing, whereas town you don’t. It makes way more sense for him to say “I’d shoot jeff even if he claimed cop and I’d love it if mafia shot him” when he’s town and really thinks jeff is scum and is arguing with Jeff than it does for him to say that as scum
but in any case you’re not actually making any kind of point for why Ekko is scum, you’re just spouting generic nonsense at me
Junk is the weirdest one. Claimed based off being setup. Which I see no evidence for. I’d look that way.Jobber doink fell off the face of the earth when I suspected him. Junk panic claimed then dipped. Magic giving me the queasys. Blaine has barely posted (did he replace ace?)
You don’t have to skim the whole thread tho, just skim the posts where they are talking to each other.I’m not worried about Jeff as he'll vote for the good of the group, but Ekko is the one who keeps saying we have to remove Jeff now. Don’t see him playing for the benefit of town, but if you guys don’t agree, I’m fine skimming the thread.