BLFFL's last stand?
- Thread starter Trip in the Head
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ban?
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,334
- Reaction score
- 1,703
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
Um, did someone disable the Ignore feature and not bother to tell me? Because the last I checked, if you don't like a poster, then you're only one button click away from making both their posts as well as their threads disappear into forum oblivion. Correct me if I'm mistaken.
I don't care for BLFFL and have made my own fair share of subtle/not-so-subtle jabs at her before like nearly everyone else has, but the truth is, there's no real cause to ban her. Not that I'm against people advocating it since she contributes nothing useful to the forum, but it's not like there aren't other ways of dealing with her. I think some here must enjoy her presence on the forum to some extent if they haven't slapped her on the Ignore list yet. TGMI is the same way. You wouldn't allow them to keep annoying you for this long, yet alone continue to bother responding to them so often if you didn't. Admit it.
ity2:ity2:ity2:
I don't care for BLFFL and have made my own fair share of subtle/not-so-subtle jabs at her before like nearly everyone else has, but the truth is, there's no real cause to ban her. Not that I'm against people advocating it since she contributes nothing useful to the forum, but it's not like there aren't other ways of dealing with her. I think some here must enjoy her presence on the forum to some extent if they haven't slapped her on the Ignore list yet. TGMI is the same way. You wouldn't allow them to keep annoying you for this long, yet alone continue to bother responding to them so often if you didn't. Admit it.
ity2:ity2:ity2:
This is a joke poll right?
2 years and 2 months registerred and now this is being brought up? The mods/admins of the past & present have already set a LARGE precedent by letting her do it for so long.. why all the sudden get fed up about it? People were telling me to shut the fuck up about it 2-3 months ago and just deal with it because she has a place on this forum..
@BrockLesnarFanForLife has my vote to stay w/ no limits.
2 years and 2 months registerred and now this is being brought up? The mods/admins of the past & present have already set a LARGE precedent by letting her do it for so long.. why all the sudden get fed up about it? People were telling me to shut the fuck up about it 2-3 months ago and just deal with it because she has a place on this forum..
@BrockLesnarFanForLife has my vote to stay w/ no limits.
My only gripe, honestly, is that she come off as having the intelligence of a mentally handicapped person.
I say that as respectfully as possible without coming off as having an attached bias.
She has a thought and, before filtering or running through some sort of systemic logic, she posts a thread.
I used to think she was actually Crayo some other admin, (which would actually be really clever and impressive at the same time)
... but that's another can of worms
I could understand being scatterbrained when you speak, but not when you are writing down a 'coherent' thought.
My best guess is BLFFL is mentally isolated and thus isn't exposed to varying personalities on a consistent basis.
My verdict: Do nothing. Ask her questions without prejudging, because of her perceived lack of intellect.
I say that as respectfully as possible without coming off as having an attached bias.
She has a thought and, before filtering or running through some sort of systemic logic, she posts a thread.
I used to think she was actually Crayo some other admin, (which would actually be really clever and impressive at the same time)
... but that's another can of worms
I could understand being scatterbrained when you speak, but not when you are writing down a 'coherent' thought.
My best guess is BLFFL is mentally isolated and thus isn't exposed to varying personalities on a consistent basis.
My verdict: Do nothing. Ask her questions without prejudging, because of her perceived lack of intellect.
That was because Crayo was in charge and he wouldn't put the community in charge of bans. He sees potential in every member. Solidus has no problem getting rid of shitty members.
Makes some sense, my only thing is Solidus has been in charge for damn near a month now, if he didn't have a problem removing "shitty members" (your words not mine), why wasn't this one of his "smaller" first actions? I mean the action itself certainly isnt time demanding by any means. Also surely he's had to have seen BLFFL's posts for awhile now being he was registered before her.
I don't ban members at the drop of a hat.
And no, I've seen very few of her posts. Mods get to reports before I do.
I'd say he had bigger issues the past month than troll users. Also, he probably hasn't banned them because he's tried limiting them first to see what difference it makes?
28 days idk if I'd necissarily call that a drop of the hat
.. They don't delete the posts though, you don't ever just hear people through the grapevine complain about her and being an admin search the forums and see what she's offering?
28 days idk if I'd necissarily call that a drop of the hat
Nope. A member came to me directly and told me about the problem. This was today, and here we are.
@Solidus
Posted in the other thread but might as well post here also;
Limitations should remove everything apart from being able to post, including the rating system, statuses, status comments (on others) etc.
I mean, taking away their ability to make threads isn't much. Leave them with the bare minimum, and if they still can't act mature just by posting, then a ban?
Posted in the other thread but might as well post here also;
Limitations should remove everything apart from being able to post, including the rating system, statuses, status comments (on others) etc.
I mean, taking away their ability to make threads isn't much. Leave them with the bare minimum, and if they still can't act mature just by posting, then a ban?
Not when some of them get their kicks from rating posts as dislike, disagree etc. for no reason
- Status