I wasn't comparing real athletes to WWE a**hole
If you bothered putting it into perspective, you'd realize I was referring to longevity vs lightning in a bottle.
I'd be offended by you calling me an asshole but it's censored, so it's all good bruh
I wasn't comparing real athletes to WWE a**hole
If you bothered putting it into perspective, you'd realize I was referring to longevity vs lightning in a bottle.
With some I wouldn't bother debating. You're smarter than this and escapes me why you would post something so stupid and asinine.I'd be offended by you calling me an asshole but it's censored, so it's all good bruh
Thought he meant ale-hole, which would be completely accurate. :heenan:I'd be offended by you calling me an asshole but it's censored, so it's all good bruh
Hogan has the longevity. Whilst Austin's impact was more concentrated/intense.
Gotta go with the Hulkster brotherjack.Pick someone then. And why isn't this a poll? Should be
Didn't think of it since I was quoting an article. Thanks thoughGotta go with the Hulkster brotherjack.
Not sure why OP didn't make a poll. I'll get on it.
One argument I've yet to hear is the number of stars each man put on the map.
Without Hogan, where would Nash, Hall, Savage, Warrior, Goldberg and Crow Sting be today?
Austin helped make The Rock a star but that's pretty much it. The Rock is a huge star, but Hogan's presence in a feud made the other the worker huge in comparison to Austin.
That may not sway anyone, but its not an argument I hear too often.