Britanica said:Don't you mean "have"? ity:
I eventually thought you would become obsessed with kids and resort to kidnapping. :troll:
Britanica said:Don't you mean "have"? ity:
CM Punk said:I eventually thought you would become obsessed with kids and resort to kidnapping. :troll:
Britanica said:is:
Okay...Maybe, MAYBE I might end up on the news freeeing animals from a zoo but kidnapping?
HEEEEEELLLLL NOOOOOOOO!
Ambrose said:I'm sorry, I thought this was thread about bears with arms. :finger:
KLockard23 said:The idea of citizens having a right to just freely bear arms is actually kinda disturbing to me. Police and military should be the only ones allowed to have access to firearms, but the problem is you can't really ban all guns at this point successfully because it'll just create a black market for criminals to get a hold of guns and leave all normal tax paying citizens basically defenseless. That's why I don't think it's a bad idea to own a gun, as long as others can just so easily get a hold of one (I don't own a gun, but probably should.) If someone can wave their magic wand and come up with a feasible plan to successfully get rid of all guns though, then I'll be all for it.
Britanica said:That's the prob. Criminals will still have guns if they outlaw them. I think they should look into screening better for gun purchases for sure, possibly making some kind of block where you have to meet certain standards to own one. But to outlaw them now, completely, will leave regular 9-5 people defenseless.
Britanica said:That's the prob. Criminals will still have guns if they outlaw them. I think they should look into screening better for gun purchases for sure, possibly making some kind of block where you have to meet certain standards to own one. But to outlaw them now, completely, will leave regular 9-5 people defenseless.
KLockard23 said:Maybe they should follow Chris Rock's advice and try Bullet Control instead of Gun Control... Charge $1000 for every bullet.