It means, your average wrestling fan, lol. In his case, it would anyone who is a neckbeard bon a incel.
It actually means smart mark, a fan who knows wrestling is a work. A mark is someone who still think it's real.
Last edited:
It means, your average wrestling fan, lol. In his case, it would anyone who is a neckbeard bon a incel.
I know, the difference, but to be fair every wrestling fan now is a Snarky because they all know it is a work and fake. That was my point as well making a joke.It actually means smart mark, a fan who knows wrestling is a work. A mark is someone who still think it's real.
I know, the difference, but to be fair every wrestling fan now is a Snarky because they all know it is a work and fake. That was my point as well making a joke.
Just remember Batista is 1-0 in MMA and Brock is 4-5 or 5-4...Batista would have a higher chance of winning, lol.True, and the term mark turned into "someone who believes their own bullshit" could be a fan or a wrestler as well.
Anyway we are going way off topic... Back to Batista, I always wanted to see him wrestle Brock that would be a cool match to see IMO.
No.It means, your average wrestling fan, lol. In his case, it would anyone who is a neckbeard bon a incel.
I personally could see him on Smackdown. Take on Orton
whoever would face him this year, would have to put big Dave over. Otherwise he'd look like a jabroni once he's up against Triple H in his initial retirement match. His run in '14 was anything but overwhelming, and that also goes for his win-loss record. His only big win was his infamous Rumble victory. So I don't see him bothering with any other match before facing Trips. On top of that he's probably busy enough as it is.
The only match I could see him take part in would be a less serious program with no titles on the line, so it'd be easy for him to go over and leave again. But I don't really see him (or the company for that matter) doing that.
If I had to pick one wrestler tho, I'd say Samoa Joe. He could lose to Batista without losing much credibility and the match/promos would be good enough
If I had to pick one wrestler tho, I'd say Samoa Joe. He could lose to Batista without losing much credibility and the match/promos would be good enough
If it was up to the internet, a lot of wrestlers "should never lose" but sometimes people just have to, not everyone can win. Comparing his treatment to Dolph's is odd because they're in completely different zones. Ziggler gets manhandled and beaten convincingly while Joe just loses from time to time but never looks like he's being squashed by his opponents.I have to disagree with that. Joe shouldn't be losing anymore matches, they need to stop treating him like a Dolph Ziggler.
He's world champion material & should be in that picture. Guy should never lose, let alone this much. Should be choking people unconscious left & right
Nakamura is dreadful. He's not fit to wash Batista's shorts.Nakamura vs Batista
If it was up to the internet, a lot of wrestlers "should never lose" but sometimes people just
There's still a good chance he's going to be WWE champion one day, but if he's not in that picture, I'd rather see him lose a competitive match against Batista rather than having him win some random ass match against a mid/upper card guy at Mania
Nakamura vs Batista