The thing is, the cards are the same. Both RAW and SmackDown almost have the same cards for over one or two months. So, why going to SmackDown if you can see the same thing on RAW?
Jose Tortilla said:The thing is, the cards are the same. Both RAW and SmackDown almost have the same cards for over one or two months. So, why going to SmackDown if you can see the same thing on RAW?
Stopspot said:WWE can easily afford to take Smackdown live weekly. It would also lover the risk of spoilers leaking which is most often a big turn of for people thinking of watching it. If they find out the entire show two days beforehand. Whats the need for watching?
CM Drunk said:They could probably afford it but even when it's live Smackdown doesn't pull in great ratings at all so it would take a while to recoup the extra amount which is probably putting them off. Not to mention it would undermine Raw as the flagship show.
Leo C said:If they made a fix change to live shows on tuesdays the ratings would get better in a few weeks, it's all a question of people adapting to the shedule. When you promote a show as bad as that "Blast from the Past" thing was, it's not a surprise that the replay on the regular schedule gets a better rating than the live edition. If they start telling people a few weeks in advance and then make the change, it'll be good.
Crayo said:A year+ ago, I'd have agreed and said make SmackDown live on Thursday nights. But now I'm certain they should just kill it.