Backstage Update on the WWE Draft, Possible Gimmick Changes for Superstars

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Rosie

Neo Genesis
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
45,159
Reaction score
20,533
Points
128
Location
New Brunswick, Canada
Favorite Wrestler
9yQJpez
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
dJvrW4y
Favorite Wrestler
kevinsteen
Favorite Wrestler
Se3BZPQ
Favorite Wrestler
q9gbHdQ
Favorite Sports Team
2DciFqq
Favorite Sports Team
OQcgyMS
Favorite Sports Team
coloradoavalanche
Favorite Sports Team
vCLYUUD
*PLE's

This is a new era.

Hogan wasn't on every PPV back in the day either.

In an era with only like maybe 3 PPVs a year. But when it is weekly TV, a champion should be around most of the time. Cena's issue was more people were tired of Cena himself. Then recently we have had Brock part-time title reigns happen for years at a time. It goes from a "special thing" to just nothing happening for months without him there.

My case for Roman dropping the belt isn't even the fact he is part-time now. The man can work a lighter schedule. It is the fact he has been champion for 700+ days. It has gotten stale even if he does good work. Yes he is a dominant champion and a final boss, but the thing is that a final boss eventually needs to be beaten. Okada, Triple H, Kagetsu in Stardom, etc, a lot of dominant champions have an end goal of losing to build a new hero or a better star. After all this time, it has to come sooner or later. His match at Mania (that has been rumoured/planned for a while now) against The Rock doesn't need a title to happen or be main event worthy. So it probably should happen before that date. Then afterwards you can probably be able to split up the titles by the rumored post-mania draft and both brands have champions, Roman can come and go for his big matches, and you have multiple stars who still are worthy and have world titles on each brand to fight over when he isn't around and give those stories a goal.
 

Cwalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
37,223
Reaction score
17,824
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
randyorton
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
codyrhodes
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
jaylethal
Favorite Sports Team
BZw58qk
I think if there were still 2 belts, you could get away with Roman not being on TV every week. But with them being unified, he should show up a little more than he does until they decide to get one or both belts him.

If only a star hadn’t got lost in the dust
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,385
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
In an era with only like maybe 3 PPVs a year. But when it is weekly TV, a champion should be around most of the time. Cena's issue was more people were tired of Cena himself. Then recently we have had Brock part-time title reigns happen for years at a time. It goes from a "special thing" to just nothing happening for months without him there.

My case for Roman dropping the belt isn't even the fact he is part-time now. The man can work a lighter schedule. It is the fact he has been champion for 700+ days. It has gotten stale even if he does good work. Yes he is a dominant champion and a final boss, but the thing is that a final boss eventually needs to be beaten. Okada, Triple H, Kagetsu in Stardom, etc, a lot of dominant champions have an end goal of losing to build a new hero or a better star. After all this time, it has to come sooner or later. His match at Mania (that has been rumoured/planned for a while now) against The Rock doesn't need a title to happen or be main event worthy. So it probably should happen before that date. Then afterwards you can probably be able to split up the titles by the rumored post-mania draft and both brands have champions, Roman can come and go for his big matches, and you have multiple stars who still are worthy and have world titles on each brand to fight over when he isn't around and give those stories a goal.
Hogan made like 6 PPVs a year in WCW and they were monthly.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
76,528
Reaction score
9,404
Points
113
Age
26
corrected to PLE

But you have to agree holding the belt this long in this day in age isn't necessary what is the point of a two year reign?
It gives legitimacy to the title to have a reign this long. Brings you back to the classic era when you had a true top guy. A top guy is someone who legit can beat all challengers and hold on to his title for a long time. Not this oh let’s have a new world champ every 3 months like they’ve done. I will admit that at this point Roman probably can lose the title and he’d be fine but it’s silly to say there was “no point” in giving him a long run like this.