Apparently CM Punk is in the doghouse...

[Double J]

Here's something else to add. Keep in mind this is all rumors;

"The problems with Punk and losing the title have been the talk of the SmackDown locker room for the past two days. As noted last night before the show, several on the SmackDown brand were under the impression that Undertaker was winning and he did. There are some who are wondering why 'Taker was given the title considering his limited schedule and health problems with the feeling that it was too soon to take the title off Punk.

Word is that WWE is planning on going with a Batista vs. Undertaker feud for the World Heavyweight Title."



So say this is true then it's pretty stupid.

"We want to build new talent and push our younger guys!"

6 minutes later....

"OK take the belt off Punk, and lets have two guys who are both talking about retiring soon fight for it! Great idea!"

 

[TK.GFX]

This news seriously disappoints me. Yeah, I know it could very well be bullshit, but if its not, then god fucking help us.

I don't know about you guys, but I honestly did not enjoy the first "amazing/epic" Taker/Batista feud, and I'm not so sure I can take sitting threw another one.

 

[JurassicBonez]

I say job the disrepectful bastard out to Slam Master J or Kung Fu Naki or something.

 

[Chuck Taylor's Grenade]

I can understand what Punk was saying about Cena. When you see John Cena you see shorts, T-shirt, sneakers and trucker hat. Punk's point was if he (Punk) had to dress appropriately then shouldn't Cena have to as well. But the concept of a dress code is stupid anyway.

 

[noumenon]

I say job the disrepectful bastard out to Slam Master J or Kung Fu Naki or something.

Shelton has had the jobbing covered for quite some time now


And besides... yeah, I'm sure a suit would fit well into someone's gimmick who's heavily tattooed and "hardcore". I don't believe any of this shit for a minute. But if they're seriously going to push Batista in favor of him I'll puke.

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

I am sorry, but I don't buy it. Sure, it can be true, but can it be as simple as WWE wanting to span the 3 HIAC throughout the shows, having to protect Taker from working a long match and for some reason considering the match the weaker of the three.

That added to the fact of not thinking or simply not wanting to put CM Punk over Taker in that particular gimmick.


But no, there's always a far more complicated reason with CM Punk.

 

[Kizza]

Word is that WWE is planning on going with a Batista vs. Undertaker feud for the World Heavyweight Title

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[TK.GFX]

Word is that WWE is planning on going with a Batista vs. Undertaker feud for the World Heavyweight Title

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

(finished for you)

 

[noumenon]

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

(finished for you)

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Now we're done.

 

[gatesoftanhauser]

oh god please no.

 

[seX-Power]

I would watch 3 hours of Batista/Taker rather than 15 minutes of Cena/Orton. :

 

[Kizza]

I would watch 3 hours of Batista/Taker rather than 15 minutes of Cena/Orton. :

I would rather kill myself then see a match involving Cena/Orton for the 44th time.

Or Batista/Taker for that matter.

 

[Gards Jr.]

Enjoy 60 Minutes of Cena/Orton at Bragging Rights. Also, I don't buy this for one minute at all.

 

[noumenon]

LOL @ Cena thinking he and Orton work well together.

 

[Dan Contogiannis]

If this is true then that's really stupid. It wouldn't even suit Punk's gimmick/image to "dress properly".