Anonymous RAW GM - To Reveal or Not to Reveal

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
I have noticed in recent weeks in the RAW LIVE Discussion threads that there is a clear divide when it comes to the Anonymous RAW General Manager.

On one side of it there is the group that feels that after more than a year WWE have to give a name and end the storyline properly otherwise it has been a waste of viewers time.

On the other side there is the group that feels that since the storyline has become so
drawn out there is no need to reveal a name and with HHH in charge they may as well scrap it without naming who it was.

What side are you on? Would you like to see the RAW GM revealed and if so who do you think makes sense? Or Would you like to see it ended right away without bothering to reveal who it was?
 

Seak

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
Points
16
I hate feeling like I watched something for nothing. There has been no payoff to this entire situation. I absolutely hate when things are just dropped with no explanation, especially something that has gotten so much focus over the past year.
 

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
18,926
Reaction score
364
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Geelong, Australia
Favorite Wrestler
chrisbenoit2
Favorite Wrestler
princedevitt
Favorite Wrestler
sethrollins
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
johncena2
Favorite Wrestler
ricochet
The anonymous GM is probably not going to be revealed, almost like how Nexus just died out without any explanation.

I seriously have no idea what WWE wants to do, if they name it then it would have to be someone heel. Kinda wished that Cole was announced GM a while ago
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Cole would have worked if they did it right after his match with Lawler at WM. They could have taken him away from the announce booth for a few months whilst he played the heel GM but they ignored it and it is a shame since that would have made a bit of sense.

My pick will be they will quickly say that it was Vince himself doing it and drop it quickly.
 

Keith

WCW Halloween Phantom
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,965
Reaction score
3,334
Points
113
Another thing is because of the way things change so quickly in WWE, it is possible that at the start of the whole angle they intended to reveal who it is, but never actually knew themselfs at that time who it would be, and it has now been so dragged out then maybe they still don't know.

I still don't mind if it is Cole, because now that JR is back, he needs to leave the boradcast table, and this would be something for him to do on raw. Or if he did resign I think Foley would be a great choice. Don't forget HHH runs the company as a whole, so I don't see a reason for him to be on Raw or Smackdown every week. When Vince was in charge you still had managers to run both shows, so there is still room for Raw to have a GM.