- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 23,057
- Reaction score
- 72
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Streets Ahead
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
I have noticed in recent weeks in the RAW LIVE Discussion threads that there is a clear divide when it comes to the Anonymous RAW General Manager.
On one side of it there is the group that feels that after more than a year WWE have to give a name and end the storyline properly otherwise it has been a waste of viewers time.
On the other side there is the group that feels that since the storyline has become so
drawn out there is no need to reveal a name and with HHH in charge they may as well scrap it without naming who it was.
What side are you on? Would you like to see the RAW GM revealed and if so who do you think makes sense? Or Would you like to see it ended right away without bothering to reveal who it was?
On one side of it there is the group that feels that after more than a year WWE have to give a name and end the storyline properly otherwise it has been a waste of viewers time.
On the other side there is the group that feels that since the storyline has become so
drawn out there is no need to reveal a name and with HHH in charge they may as well scrap it without naming who it was.
What side are you on? Would you like to see the RAW GM revealed and if so who do you think makes sense? Or Would you like to see it ended right away without bothering to reveal who it was?