American Badass?

[★Chuck Zombie★]

But this doesn't exactly mean an american badass style taker, remember when Taker came back from hsi last ABA stint at WM XX against Kane and he had short buzz cut like hair which grew back to his current hair before Summerslam.

This is obviously fan made, but this is what his hair looked like at WMXX:

This is a buzz cut:

Huge difference.




As for the report, he could have had his hair tucked up inside a hat. CM Punk did this whne I met him.

 

[kingovkings]

He will be come back as Taker. Shorter hair could mean he had a few inches cut off. And if thats the case will grow back pretty quickly. Id love Him to come back with a change be nice. But i doubt it will happen. Id put money on him returning as Taker.

 

[Ballin]

Why all the hate on American Badass? Personally, I would love to see Taker return as ABA. Why? Because the 'Deadman' shit gets really old. The 20 min. entrances, the similar promos each Smackdown, and everything that comes with it. And the cheers from the children? Noone cares, you mainly see adults/teens in the crowd and I dont remember Taker ever being aimed directly children.

 

[Great One]

Why were you in such desperation for love that you turned to the internet only to learn that the woman wasn't who she said she was?


Oh....right.


Moving back on topic. American Badass would be a horrible way for him to go out. He started his career as the Dead Man, and continually evolved that persona which on any other guy wouldn't of lasted six months. He needs to retire as Undertaker, not "geritol biker dude".

And I said 50 as a generality because I legitimately did not know his age and couldn't be arsed to look up his information just so I can avoid smarks trying to discredit my argument by tiny details.

Nice try though, good luck finding that next online date.

Rofl, figures your sad ass would try to bring something like that up (of which you have no idea about). Makes sense when you're one of the dipshits in this world who think they know for a fact that Michael Jackson was a pedophile (and your dumbass also didn't even know the reason he was white was because he had a skin disease).

A "geritol biker dude," once again you're Blue (big surprise), and are proving my point that you just sit and type with no facts (i.e. talking out of your ass like a tool). Which is ironic considering all you were bitching about was to 'look at the facts' in the Michael Jackson thread. Conclusion - YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT, face it. Undertaker has openly said that his 2001 return was way more refreshing as it allowed him to be HIMSELF (i.e. he likes bikes dumbass), and was way more how he really was in real life. So no, he would be retiring more as himself, not as a gimmick which is fitting for any man who would want to end their LONG ass, amazing career respectfully.

Smark? Tiny details? Undertaker is as much 50 as Edge is a 40 year old guy. The only details that matter is he's 44 years old and can out perform and has more talent than most of the entire roster. Only a "smark" couldn't see this and someone like yourself who tries to act cool by saying or implying "OMG UNDERTAKER IS SO OLD PLEASE RETIRE," same thing with Ric Flair, although it was more meritable against him.

Lol at you even bringing up the word smark considering the initial post.

Nice try, good luck staying 21, stupid/ignorant, and a fucking loser. =(

 

[xtremebadass]

He should go out as the American Badass because when he is inducted into the HOF, WWE would want him to still be in his gimmick. So he is going to come through the stage with smoke and accept his plaque being inducted by Kane, then Paul Bearer comes out and hits Taker with a chair. Kane chokeslams Taker through the stage into a burst of flames. Kane takes the plaque and says Taker will forever rest in peace in the WWE HOF.

It would be a hell of alot more formal if he was Big Evil so he can act like a normal person.

Side note, I think Michelle McCool is trying to get in Taker's pants because she knows he'll die way before she does and she gets all of his shit!

 

[Wrestling Station]

When he was ABA, he was not in shape. I remember his matches against Triple H at that time he was having that big belly and no muscles whatsoever. He looked like a BUM tbh.

 

[Kaedon]

I think it means....



He got a haircut

 

[the dark knight]

I think it means....



He got a haircut

cunt, i wanted to say that.


anyone remembers him in UFC last year, lesnar's first match? he was the american badass...

he still appeared on smackdown same way he was.

 

[PeepShow]

When he was ABA, he was not in shape. I remember his matches against Triple H at that time he was having that big belly and no muscles whatsoever. He looked like a BUM tbh.

And yet the matches I remember him in, were great ones.

vs HHH @ WM 17

vs Flair at MM 18

vs Jeff on Raw in 03

w/ Kane vs. E&C and others

vs Angle various times

vs Lesnar

etc...

 

[the dark knight]

^^WS doesn't care about that, just how good the wrestlers look :shifty:

edit-

no offense or anything ws, but you seem to confuse bodybuilding with wrestling all the time. lol batista.

 

[chessarmy]

Rofl, figures your sad ass would try to bring something like that up (of which you have no idea about). Makes sense when you're one of the dipshits in this world who think they know for a fact that Michael Jackson was a pedophile (and your dumbass also didn't even know the reason he was white was because he had a skin disease).

A "geritol biker dude," once again you're Blue (big surprise), and are proving my point that you just sit and type with no facts (i.e. talking out of your ass like a tool). Which is ironic considering all you were bitching about was to 'look at the facts' in the Michael Jackson thread. Conclusion - YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT, face it. Undertaker has openly said that his 2001 return was way more refreshing as it allowed him to be HIMSELF (i.e. he likes bikes dumbass), and was way more how he really was in real life. So no, he would be retiring more as himself, not as a gimmick which is fitting for any man who would want to end their LONG ass, amazing career respectfully.

Smark? Tiny details? Undertaker is as much 50 as Edge is a 40 year old guy. The only details that matter is he's 44 years old and can out perform and has more talent than most of the entire roster. Only a "smark" couldn't see this and someone like yourself who tries to act cool by saying or implying "OMG UNDERTAKER IS SO OLD PLEASE RETIRE," same thing with Ric Flair, although it was more meritable against him.

Lol at you even bringing up the word smark considering the initial post.

Nice try, good luck staying 21, stupid/ignorant, and a fucking loser. =(

Wow Great One, next time if you're going to debate someone try and not fucking call them a blueberry like a 10 year old. Its possible to have a wrestling debate without turning it into a flame war. You came off as an immature little prick right there

 

[Quintastic One]

To be fair I started off with the potshots about his horrible taste in women and need to develop online relationships because he sucks at being a people person, and fails at real life.

Well crap, I did it again.

Other than that, I actually agree with the fact that american badass taker would be more presentable in a HOF type ceremony. But in virtually every other aspect, he sucked as American Badass. And honestly the only people who loved American Badass > Real Undertaker are not real Undertaker fans. He started out as the Taker gimmick, evolved it into the Phenom, then turned his back on the gimmick entirely to be "geritol biker dude". And yes thats the gimmick whether you want to admit it or not. I rejoiced so much when he came back as the fusion of ABA and Undertaker. Because he easily doubled his moveset, something he lost when he gave up a majority of his best moves to Kane. And has become all the more better in his wrestling style rather than just using one gimmick or the other.

So no ABA please, stick to what your good at. I don't need to see you start getting a beer gut again and acting like this is "Your yard" when your actually in a wrestling ring. Thank you.

 

[Great One]

Wow Great One, next time if you're going to debate someone try and not fucking call them a blueberry like a 10 year old. Its possible to have a wrestling debate without turning it into a flame war. You came off as an immature little prick right there

Lol, are you this fucking stupid or did you not see his reply to mine? 90% of his post was a flame. Also, lol at the if you flame/cuss = immature logic again, fail. Hell, he just admitted it, get off his dick.

Anyways yeah, good choice in evading the argument and not bothering to refute my points. Undertaker was just as much of a gimmick then as Triple H is now. You're obviously too much of an ignorant twat to argue with as you still try so hard to take a shot at me with irrelevant random things that it's ridiculously pathetic.

 

[Quintastic One]

Despite the fact that I just used the majority of my post to develop an entire argument stating some pros about ABA while still maintaining my love for old Taker gimmicks.

Also, my admissions was half admission, half sarcasm. Because I know I shouldn't of brought irrelevent things into the debate, but you actually were the one who started it by throwing a potshot at me saying every post I make it Blue.

So you give a flame you receive a flame, but whatever. Try staying on topic from now on instead of picking fights with Chessarmy and I.

 

[Great One]

No I said they seem to be Blue, and you got butthurt (obviously, based on how hard you tried to insult me loool). Lol, yeah I was totally picking a fight with chessarmy...