I mean everyone knew it would help boost the ratings. It’s only really a net positive if AEW retain that bump. Which I am hoping they do.guess it wasn't so pointless huh
oh believe me, the amount of ppl, especially media that were pushing the ''if this doesnt do a good rating its a failure'' were numerous and it was one of the big talking points why they shouldnt do itKross Rhodes said:
Yeah, the ratings was never something I was worried about when I thought they shouldn’t do this. And I’m gonna be guessing though a lot of those same people are probably not gonna consider this a success. I’ll give them the credit for getting a boost back up to 812 but a lot of those people are probably gonna consider this a failure still so I really wouldn’t worry too much about those people.
Oh, like I said, I definitely think it’s a good boost but my guess is when they start to roll out their takes they’re gonna say that they just got back to where they had been only a month ago so it wasn’t really a big deal.
its funny because Raw will probably be down like 30+% next monday now that mania is over . but no one will care (nor should day because its normal lol)Kross Rhodes said:
These are generally the same people that were calling this a WCW tactic so my guess is in their heads for this to be a success they were gonna have to get something like a Goldberg beating Hogan type bump.
its generally younger ppl who have had nothing but wwe as wrestling for a long time and feel threatened by aew's existence for wtv reason.Kross Rhodes said:
