That IMO would be dumb. I get you didn't want him as champ but come on, that's some TNA type booking if they did that.There's a difference if the reigns happen in the middle. WWE just rebooted the Women's Championship.
And WWE could retire "that" Universal Championship and start a new one tonight.
Get him some silver pants and ditch Enzo and we got ourselves a new main event.He looks like Test
Not really. You don't want people to look at your "top" belt and see the first champion couldn't hold it longer than one day.That IMO would be dumb. I get you didn't want him as champ but come on, that's some TNA type booking if they did that.
When they been promoting Finn winning it all night yeah it really is. They are saying two different things. "Look Finn won the title!" and then "Oh look our first champion!" ....TNANot really. You don't want people to look at your "top" belt and see the first champion couldn't hold it longer than one day.
Not really. You don't want people to look at your "top" belt and see the first champion couldn't hold it longer than one day.
Cause it was his fault he got injured. If anything it makes the title look legit that balor was willing to work through an injury to win it.Not really. You don't want people to look at your "top" belt and see the first champion couldn't hold it longer than one day.
Yeah, I replied to that post. It's easier to reboot a title when that was the first reign.Once again, I refer you to my post about Kane/Mankind losing the WWF Championship the night after they won it
Edit: didn't read the word "first" in your post. Either way, injuries happen. No need to act like his victory didn't occur
Rebooting titles isn't a TNA thing. WWE just rebooted its women's title.When they been promoting Finn winning it all night yeah it really is. They are saying two different things. "Look Finn won the title!" and then "Oh look our first champion!" ....TNA