50 Man Royal Rumble (April 27th)

[MildlyUpsetGerbil]

3. A REALLY good prize. If WWE wants us to believe that these people are willing to fight 49 others for this, it better be something good, maybe a money-in-the-bank type thing?

I absolutely agree. There's no way this can be the "greatest Royal Rumble ever" if the reward for the winner is nothing more than a pat on the back.

 

[RedDwarfTechy]

OMG Roman is part of the Royal Rumble! GUIS! He isn't winning the title at WM!
:madcat:

Spoiler

Just kidding, he's still gonna win the title and win this one too!6:

 

[Gman003]

I actually think this would be awesome to witness in person. Regardless of who's in it, what the prize is etc.

I'm sure the people attending aren't too concerned with it either. It's a huge royal rumble. That's enough of a draw for me.

 

[InSaNe]

When I first saw this, I was a lil confused - we just had Royal Rumble, ya know.

But I'm interested in the show just to see how it would play out. I hope it's not just a "one-off" kind of thing, and I really hope the reward is as good as the event itself.

50-Man Royal Rumble? Sign me up, dude.

 

[Ryan Blade]

Listen jack, this live event is going to draw terrible numbers, brother.

April 27?

Listen dude, everyone is going to be watching Infinity War that day so nobody is watching this match. It's just the truth of the matter HH

 

[Jeffry Mason]

If Roman loses we riot.

Also they should just add 10 people and 2 rings and make it World War 3

 

[Grievous 3D]

If Roman loses we riot.

Well...you'll riot...a lot of other people will cheer as
he gets his boring ass dumped out of the ring.

Also they should just add 10 people and 2 rings and make it World War 3

Now that idea...I actually totally 100% agree with...

 

[v1LL1n]

Much ado about nothing comes to mind here. What will the stakes be? Bragging rights that lead nowhere? 50 people means 45 others who wont be believable contenders to actually win. At least a lot of wrestlers will be able to participate in a grand event