I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
To me it just doesn't make any sense to put Ric Flair on the same level of wrestlers like Angle, HBK or Bret Hart (just to name a few) ... But obviously I'm the Blue here :grinning:
You can say that I don't know what I'm looking at, and I can say that Flair is a shitty human being, 2nd rate and ovverated shitty wrestler. Like someone said before, "that's your opinion and that's fair", and that's mine.
OK. Nevermind. I don't want to go offtopic. I never liked Flair, but aside my personal wrestling taste, putting Ric Flair on the same level of Benoit, Angle, Hart, and HBK ... It's pure madness IMO.
period, for me.
If we want to talk about ring performances ... Seriously? If Flair was a good wrestler what the hell were Bret Hart, Kurt Angle, Benoit, HBK ... Aliens?
Everyone in the business said that Ric Flair's an asshole ... I mean, EVERYONE.
He had also issues with Foley, Steiner, Nash, Bruno Sammartino, Dusty Rhodes, Shane Douglas ... And many others
LOL ... In Italy we use to say "the poop and the chocolate" (maybe it's also said in the rest of the world :laughing:).
However Hogan is the poop. Undertaker may not be my favourite chocolate, but still.
Definitely a tough one ...
As ring performers maybe Michaels is a little bit better, but on the mic there's no challenge ... Y2J wins hands down.
So, considering the fact that Michaels is a shitty human being ...
I pick Y2J