Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep: Austin deserved that match with Bret Hart far more and we saw exactly why. The Montreal Screwjob
  2. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep Stone Cold only having 6 world title reigns.
  3. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep, but only because he's wrestling Cena. In ANY other scenario, I would've said change, but my oh my, the reaction that the Internet Wrestling Community is going to have after John Cena makes that punk ass tap is going to be absolutely..... cpRD6WXIKYA Christian winning the World...
  4. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Why is it a stupid question to ask which name people prefer? Change. Sheamus is fucking garbage. Eddie Guerrero winning the WWE Championship at No Way Out instead of at WrestleMania like Benoit
  5. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    It was actually the travel schedule that did him in, but anyway... Keep. Why the hell not. Mistico having to change his name to Sin Cara (I know there was no way around it because CMLL owns the copyright, but work around that)
  6. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change: He should've came in this year to face Undertaker. It would've provided far more interesting build than what we got. Brock Lesnar leaving WWE in 2004
  7. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Yeah, I'll bet you don't see how. You probably thought Edge winning was the smart decision. :rolleyes: God knows how people can think like this. Baffling.... Keep: Because he's awesome. The Montreal Screwjob
  8. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep ADR being screwed over by a broken down hack like Edge who's retired 1 week after WrestleMania.
  9. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep. He just wasn't worthy of it. I would've said change a couple years ago because I used to be a fan of him but that was before I fully developed my distaste for people without mic skills. Don't know what I was thinking. There's a reason he wasn't over at ALL. Kane getting the world title...
  10. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep. Why not, it was good to see him throw back to the rap persona, and it was even better to see him embarass The Rock, to which Rock clearly had no rebuttal for and just said a bunch of nothing like he always does. Khali becoming world champion...I can already guess the outcome of this...
  11. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    You're talking to ME. Come on. You know I don't give a flying fuck about match quality and ESPECIALLY not when there's another chance to see the second greatest WWE Champion of all time at stake. Keep. Barrett CAN'T be a face, I am convinced. It just won't work, any more than Rey Mysterio...
  12. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change, but you already knew that... Zach Ryder being a jobber
  13. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep: Because Del Rio actually CAN become world champion. Christian, no matter how superior to Del Rio he is, can't. Sin Cara not wrestling his first week on television
  14. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Well, in today's WWE that's the truth... Keep: It left Laycool, Vickie, John Morrison and Dolph Ziggler to do nothing at WrestleMania which is exactly what they deserved, and it was very short so we didn't have to suffer through the Jersey Shore cunt doing much of anything. A perfect piss...
  15. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change: They should've been able to wait until WrestleMania 29. Taker needs a match with Cena at WM but he CANNOT get to 21-0 or even 19-1, he needs to retire once he hits the 20-0 landmark. That's why it had to happen next year. 20-0 was perfect, now he has to take a year off, or it's wasted on...
  16. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Keep: It doesn't matter in the slightest. Jack Swagger winning Money In The Bank at WrestleMania 26.
  17. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    The way they book him, I'm not even sure if they want him to have another. Change. It never should've happened. They should've stuck with Barrett and he should be walking into WrestleMania as WWE Champion to face Cena. Kofi Kingston being jobbed out like a bitch.
  18. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change. He should have won one of them, but Bret's an asshole and never put anyone over. CM Punk not already being a 10 time world champion.
  19. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change. I couldn't stand it when Bearer was with Kane (the most recent turn I assume is what you're referring to). He makes an amazingly perfect manager for Undertaker. Jake Roberts never winning a title.
  20. Kingslayer

    WWE History: Change or Keep

    Change. Just a bad idea. It was stupid, it turned DDP into a joke and it never helped anything. The anonymous Raw GM
Top Bottom