Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Touched on these two already. A lot of (over-?)justification for his whereabouts, plus some meta references and speculation on QT interactions. More meta QT speculation. Nothing, under the guise of being helpful. Victory lap (with a subtle emphasis on TP being scum rather than the SK —...
  2. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I don't know how to elucidate it. I've just been playing the game for a while, and a handful of his posts have carried a "How do you do, fellow townies?" vibe to me.
  3. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    No Lynch after TP the SK got 86ed.
  4. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Phrasing. It's almost always phrasing.
  5. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Just nonsense scum posts. And I'm just sort of whatever on the Day 1 census bit. It makes sense. This was more about putting the read down for posterity in case I die than anything I wanted to act on immediately.
  6. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    If Mitch hadn't already claimed, I'd be convinced he was scum by now.
  7. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    This sounds like the SK, but then the words "factional kill" are used. That's tripping me up.
  8. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I’ll just go fuck myself. Mahalo!
  9. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    No one answered my question, I don’t think. Given the claimed roles/usage, who do we surmise shot at whom?
  10. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Odo, are you just going to let your fellow scummate taunt you like that?
  11. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    So, who shot whomst'd've then?
  12. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Really was a Lethal Weapon, tbh.
  13. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I am unvoting Doddsy, though. Unvote: Doddsy. Someone make sense of the shots that were fired last night to me. Should he still have had a BP vest? Does that work for daykills?
  14. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I mean, if you want to say the scrotum worked, we can just lynch you instead.
  15. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Unvote: Doddsy. Vote: T-Pein™.
  16. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I was about to switch my vote lmao. :eating2
  17. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    Remind me if TP claimed. Was he the one with the fake FITZ gimmick?
  18. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I'm malleable. I just don't think we get anything else across the finish line. If others disagree, I'm open to it. If not, let's at least make a conscious decision on whether or not we're lynching Doddsy here.
  19. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    I said I was of two minds of your Day 1. I never said I struggled to read you; that was someone else.
  20. RetepAdam.

    ROMANVM HISTORIVM: A Roman History Mafia Game Thread

    If we're buying that scenario, that would mean scum or SK killed TFW. Which... why?
Top Bottom