No More Happy Endings - Once Upon a Time Mafia Game Thread

[PHEN0M]

Friendly reminder to fellow town that Juice is the only confirmed player BUT I wouldn’t say a BG would be effective N2, go for it N3 though. That won’t make sense but felt necessary to say it.

 

[Mandalorian]

There was an executioner role in the Christmas mafia where I was scum and I don’t recall there being any requirement that the executioner themselves had to vote.

 

[Ekkologix]

There was an executioner role in the Christmas mafia where I was scum and I don’t recall there being any requirement that the executioner themselves had to vote.

there arent any
anybody could execute
most often than not mafia wud be on the wagon to help achieve the required minimum votes on it

 

[Wangman Page]

thats correct yes. it was executed b4 I get a chance to vote but I wanted to vote after I see the vote count


i didn't lol

Ok. My bad. I misread that post then.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

 

[Canadian Dragon]

So you believe there's merit to what he says? Even though the only case he has is a quibble over when the execute happened

only the part where you were on the wagon. I don't put much stock in you being the 4th vote though because there's plenty of wifom for and against that being scummy

 

[Mandalorian]

there arent any
anybody could execute
most often than not mafia wud be on the wagon to help achieve the required minimum votes on it

Agreed with the last point, hence why I initially said the first four on there should be looked at. I also accept I was vote 5 and if people want to bring me into that group I’m fine with that, although my vote didn’t ultimately matter.

Sky’s argument against me is that she said I activated the execute with my vote as it was the last, but as I thought, anyone could have done that. That was her argument for me being one of the main two suspects with Nom.

My point was that her vote is the one that actually sealed the lynch condition.

 

[Sky]

Agreed with the last point, hence why I initially said the first four on there should be looked at. I also accept I was vote 5 and if people want to bring me into that group I’m fine with that, although my vote didn’t ultimately matter.

Sky’s argument against me is that she said I activated the execute with my vote as it was the last, but as I thought, anyone could have done that. That was her argument for me being one of the main two suspects with Nom.

My point was that her vote is the one that actually sealed the lynch condition.

I didn't say you activated it "with" your vote. I said that you voted, and then immediately after that activated the execute in scum chat. The narrative that a vote activated the execute somehow is the only thing you have to stand on for calling me potential scum

 

[Mandalorian]

I didn't say you activated it "with" your vote. I said that you voted, and then immediately after that activated the execute in scum chat. The narrative that a vote activated the execute somehow is the only thing you have to stand on for calling me potential scum

What you are saying applies to literally anyone. Why have you singled me out?

 

[Mandalorian]

And as established, the execute could have been activated after your vote, not mine.

 

[Mandalorian]

So it is entirely possible that Sky did exactly what she is accusing me of. In fact it would have made more sense for her to do it than me because she was the fourth vote and could have locked it in immediately.

 

[Sky]

What you are saying applies to literally anyone. Why have you singled me out?

Because you're the one who voted last. If I had to guess you were probably working under the assumption that "half majority" means 5/8 not 4/8 (as it is for regular votes, you need 12/22 not 11/22 for example), and now you're trying to get heat off yourself by claiming your position is the other way around

And as established, the execute could have been activated after your vote, not mine.

But does that mean I activated it? That's the question you've got to ask yourself.

 

[Sky]

I swear if the way Smark worded a mechanical explanation gets me ML'd

 

[Mandalorian]

Because you're the one who voted last. If I had to guess you were probably working under the assumption that "half majority" means 5/8 not 4/8 (as it is for regular votes, you need 12/22 not 11/22 for example), and now you're trying to get heat off yourself by claiming your position is the other way around

But does that mean I activated it? That's the question you've got to ask yourself.

That is absolutely ridiculous to the point where you’re almost insulting my intelligence by even suggesting it. You’re also forgetting that in this scenario you’ve created I’d have a team with me who would have all had to have made the same boneheaded misunderstanding.

I’m an accountant, I know what half of 8 is. That is absolutely dire reasoning.

Does my vote being on there last mean I activated it? Everything you are saying (apart from the awful maths) I can just say the same back to you. You do get that right?

 

[Sky]

That is absolutely ridiculous to the point where you’re almost insulting my intelligence by even suggesting it. You’re also forgetting that in this scenario you’ve created I’d have a team with me who would have all had to have made the same boneheaded misunderstanding.

I’m an accountant, I know what half of 8 is. That is absolutely dire reasoning.

Does my vote being on there last mean I activated it? Everything you are saying (apart from the awful maths) I can just say the same back to you. You do get that right?

Do you really think I'm scum or are you just rushing to defend yourself

 

[Mandalorian]

Do you really think I'm scum or are you just rushing to defend yourself

I think you’re going out of your way to paint me out as scum with half-baked and nonsensical reasoning.