Death on the Nile [A Detective Adventure Part II]

[John McHenry]

Idk maybe I'm overanalyzing this but I'd like to think that if Poyser was dead wrong on his opinions they'd have simply kept him alive regardless of how high priority a target he usually is.

But on the other hand they could have assumed that killing him knew it'd draw suspension away further as we'd go after those he targeted

 

[Doddsy]

Idk maybe I'm overanalyzing this but I'd like to think that if Poyser was dead wrong on his opinions they'd have simply kept him alive regardless of how high priority a target he usually is.

I don't agree depending on the actual scum team.

well the former isnt really true, its not simply the poyser died, its thhat poyser was essentially playing town and pushing Ekko and to a degree haza. poyser is a good player with generally good reads, and those players were also sussed the day prior (namely ekko, i dont think haza was pushed at all) . so its a bit disingenuous to frame the case on ekko especially on "oh well poyser died" because...ya thats just not factually true

Ekko gets pushed as scum every game and flips town to be fair

 

[Canadian Dragon]

That being said if one out of Holt/SA/Mando is scum we might as well figure that trio out first

vote Mando

have you no paranoia that mchhenry could be scum and giving us three town names? im not saying thats what i think, but im not sure locking us in a three ppl thing is necessarily good science over reads?

 

[Lethal]

That being said if one out of Holt/SA/Mando is scum we might as well figure that trio out first

vote Mando

I have to ask, why mando first?

 

[Lethal]

have you no paranoia that mchhenry could be scum and giving us three town names? im not saying thats what i think, but im not sure locking us in a three ppl thing is necessarily good science over reads?

This is a good point that I didn't consider. Scum Jeff doesn't entertain these angles.

Ok, we're now friends.

 

[John McHenry]

I've gone from naive new player to evil genius? My game is terrible or on point.

 

[RDK]

have you no paranoia that mchhenry could be scum and giving us three town names? im not saying thats what i think, but im not sure locking us in a three ppl thing is necessarily good science over reads?

I'm fairly sure he's town

 

[Canadian Dragon]

I'm fairly sure he's town

who

 

[RDK]

who

McHenry, not paranoid about his slot at all. But ofc your caution is respected

 

[Canadian Dragon]

McHenry, not paranoid about his slot at all. But ofc your caution is respected

fwiw thats only part of the argument. the whole point of my role is to use is a few times to narrow, and while we know for sure one is scum if mchenry is town, im still not sure its the wisest thing to use as "we must figure these 3" . now that being said, doddsy's previous points on mando are also fair.

what do u think of @Tweet now going mando after the info yet he had shown paranoia when doddsy implied he may have info over the other 2. @Tweet u should answer this too

 

[Canadian Dragon]

where did @Junkette go

 

[Tweet]

have you no paranoia that mchhenry could be scum and giving us three town names? im not saying thats what i think, but im not sure locking us in a three ppl thing is necessarily good science over reads?

I trust your role to be town, and I think McNorthpole is town as well so I don't see much of a reason to get paranoid. Sure I could be wrong and he could be lying about those names but that's a bridge we can cross if we ever get there.

 

[Tweet]

I have to ask, why mando first?

We already got someone wanting to steer us in that direction so we might as well start off there.

 

[Sister Abigail]

Working with Ekko

Shading Barry for sussing of Ekko

So that's 3 posts kinda connecting them together if there's a connection.

Time to look at Mando now

Really weird that out of the few reads I've posted, you've just decided to hone in on Ekko. What to you have to say about anything else I've mentioned?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Appreciate the answer