Debate WWE stuff with me

[Nostradamus]

I love to have debates about things with the WWE, whether it be historical stuff or anything recent. Bring up a topic and let's all talk about it in a non-dickish way.

 

[Nostradamus]

@Jacob Fox you'd enjoy this.

 

[Pop Tatari]

so we are going to mass debate? :

 

[Nostradamus]

so we are going to mass debate? :

Mass debate with a master debater

 

[Nikki Nitro]

OMG...

 

[edge4ever]

No

 

[Solidus1]

Kane is better than Undertaker.

 

[Grievous 3D]

Hey...everyone knows I'm the Best Mass Debater on this forum!

Wait...I think I worded that wrong...

 

[edge4ever]

Kane is better than Undertaker.

Your face

 

[Nostradamus]

Kane is better than Undertaker.

Great thing to talk about! What makes you believe this, is it just because you like Kane or is it based off something else? Kane is probably the greatest "mindless" monster from WWE history, but I do not think he's better than Undertaker.

 

[Grievous 3D]

Great thing to talk about! What makes you believe this, is it just because you like Kane or is it based off something else? Kane is probably the greatest "mindless" monster from WWE history, but I do not think he's better than Undertaker.

Its a strange viewpoint to have...because lets be honest...Kane was
originally a Michael Myers inspired "replicant" of the Undertaker.

I think (originally) Kane had a better look than the Undertaker...but
in hindsight Taker has always a better in-ring worker than Kane.

I'm more of Kane guy myself (the 2001 Royal Rumble being one
of my all time favorite matches) but then I think that simply comes
from my respect of Glen Jacobs and his body language & silent
monster performance during Kane's early years.

I'm a big fan of "suit actors" (Guys in monster/alien suits) & motion
capture acting...and I always found early Kane highly entertaining
to watch.

I mean I was that big of Kane fan that I literally stopped watching
wrestling once he first took his mask off & I didn't come back to the
product until I saw an image of Charlotte Flair late in 2016.

 

[Zardnaar]

Undertaker has benefited from way better booking than Kane.

Still UT is better in ring worker even giving Kane the benefit of ignoring everything after 2001/2.

 

[Solid Snake]

Great thing to talk about! What makes you believe this, is it just because you like Kane or is it based off something else? Kane is probably the greatest "mindless" monster from WWE history, but I do not think he's better than Undertaker.

Longevity wise, Undertaker is better but I think Kane had a better hard hitting start. The background was great and when he was a basically voiceless monster, it was amazing. Paul played a role in this for sure but Kane back in the day > Undertaker back in the day in my book.

 

[Nostradamus]

Longevity wise, Undertaker is better but I think Kane had a better hard hitting start. The background was great and when he was a basically voiceless monster, it was amazing. Paul played a role in this for sure but Kane back in the day > Undertaker back in the day in my book.

Looking back at Kane from old stuff I've watched, I do agree that he excited me more when he first came around, but after around the first maybe two years, I was less interested. I only became more interested in him when he was more disturbed (around the time when he had his Slow Chemical theme, before he took off the mask). Also, whenever Kane turned it was always rough, he never did it seamlessly until he almost murdered RVD and later Shane, imo.

 

[CM Punk]

Sami Zayn doesn't scream World Championship material.