They are practically an Indy.
AEW is on national tv yet only draws less than a million, they are therefore statistically the worst product.
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
The First Annual WrestlingSharts Awards - Final Voting Phase
- Thread starter Sky
- Start date
They are practically an Indy.
AEW is on national tv yet only draws less than a million, they are therefore statistically the worst product.
Impact draws better ratings when AEW people are on the show. FACTS.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So that makes it bad? If you think AEW is up there for worst company, then you are apart of a niche fanbase
Because AEW draws more. No one said Impact drew more than AEW.
I stated that AEW is objectively the worst wrestling company of 2020 due to the fact that they are on a National cable network in TNT yet only draw less than 1 million viewers, averaging around 600-700k
It does make it bad, and no I’m not part of a niche fanbase, I’m part of the 11 million people who stopped watching wrestling since 2000 and the millions and millions of mainstream audiences who reject professional wrestling for being horrible.
Ratings don’t means something is worse.. if a show you like gets shitty ratings, does it means the show sucks? No.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
See the thing is, it does to Mr. Stein tho lol if it's not trendy and popular it's not good
He
really does like his popularity.
It does mean it sucks.
Pizza being one of the most popular foods is testament to how good it is, that’s how we measure the quality of entertainment.
Since entertainment is subjective, it’s measured by popularity. Unlike Scientific facts or Morality which are measured objectively regardless of opinion.
Notice I never said certain forms of entertainment sucks to the person who says it doesn’t, I’m saying objectively measured, by definition it sucks.
I can’t imagine how much life has to suck if you can only enjoy stuff that’s popular.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you think Gone with the Wind is the best movie ever? If you take in inflection, no movie has made more money than it. Therefor it has to be the best movie of ALL DAMN TIME!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Objectively? Yes, because most people like it. It’s not my favorite movie, nor does my opinion on it change that it is the best and most successful.
It’s just the most successful. Not the best.
Best is all a matter of opinion. What one person thinks is the best and another thinks is the best will be two different things. To me the best is the Back to the Future Movies. I watch them at least 3 or 4 times a year. I love those movies.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Objectively the best, most people bought it, most people liked it.
I don’t have it as my personal best, doesn’t change that it is objectively the best.
We just see things differently then. Because I don’t see something as being able to objectively be the best or objectively suck because I don’t give any fucks if someone likes something or not. If I do, that’s all that matters to me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk