Norse Mythology Mafia - Game Thread

[Bobby Barrows]

you havent been very either too so dont be just coming after Jeff lol

I've been pretty fairly polite this game thus far, don't know what you're on about.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

is this a real question. obviously.

Pass that shit over, while also voting for N0M.

 

[Daddy Deville]

@Jeff Valley Driver is my

 

[Xenus]

You are being weasely as fuck

Am I? Please elaborate, because all I’ve done so far is not agree with you. I saw how your posts had been misconstrued and moved my vote away from you, but now I don’t agree with you enough to want to vote Jeff, that’s a problem? I’m not sure which way I was manipulated and by whom and without that surety I’m not pushing either way. I don’t like your reaction to me just not agreeing with you though.

Not very there guys.

Thanks Barry, but CP and I are from an era where there were no rules. CP and I could tear each other apart in this game and still be after because we know where the game ends and life begins. Not a fan of this pals era FWIW

 

[Daddy Deville]

Eat a snickers, Omb.

Candy sucks I never liked Candy so no snickers

 

[Daddy Deville]

Am I? Please elaborate, because all I’ve done so far is not agree with you. I saw how your posts had been misconstrued and moved my vote away from you, but now I don’t agree with you enough to want to vote Jeff, that’s a problem? I’m not sure which way I was manipulated and by whom and without that surety I’m not pushing either way. I don’t like your reaction to me just not agreeing with you though.



Thanks Barry, but CP and I are from an era where there were no rules. CP and I could tear each other apart in this game and still be after because we know where the game ends and life begins. Not a fan of this pals era FWIW

 

[Xenus]

You keep pushing me for reasons I perceive to be nonsense and I'm still pretty sour about the suggestion of infolynching me d1. What even is this "non-committal shade" stuff, I only got one vote, most of the shade I throw is gonna be non-committal by definition.

My point is you don’t actually shade me for anything. You keep saying you don’t feel good about me but don’t give any reasons. You seem to link me and Lethal with literally no evidence and have not once made any play based reason for the read. Considering you and I have not really interacted well, ever, you seem to be pretty confident in your seemingly gut read and I think you’re just doing stuff to keep busy and I’m struggling to understand why I’m the only one who sees it. I’ll quote evidence in a separate post cause phone

 

[Xenus]

unvote
vote Xenus

Lethals play is still odd but that claim seems very non-fake.

Xenus, my case on Lethal first was that he seemed similar to his play in MTG (he was SK IIRC) but that turned out to be a false comparison. The next thing I didnt like about him is that first he gave me a town lean for things I could easily fake (I didnt point this out at the time but others did), then when I sussed him he came at me with token "you must have an agenda" hogwash, only to then keep saying he's leaning town with me. He can't seem to keep his story straight and if it wasnt for that claim I'd be pushing for a lynch rn.

FTR, I dont think Lethals claim is so incredibly valuable that the role deters me, it's just I dont think it's a fake he or a potential team came up with. I dont particularly care about those Valhalla/Hel mechanics atm.

Literally no mention of any reason to vote me here.

I'm not feeling Tweet or Xenus as particularly scummy. What do you guys think of Jeff letting Lethal push lies that he knew were lies and then giving awful reasons for joining the wagon on me?

I was tying Xenus and Lethal together cause it seemed to me during d1 that Xenus didnt seem to want us talking about Lethal too much, but then the issue was why would scum Xenus protect scum Lethal that way? If it's scum Xenus goodguying a town Lethal that suddenly makes a lot more sense.

Ok half a reason so I ask for any evidence because I don’t think I mentioned Lethal at all D1.

Evidence please? Today, yes, because I felt the wagon was trash. Not D1.

Gonna have to gradually reread those last 10 pages gradually, I'm on my way to work and only really skimmed them.

Still waiting for this to actually happen

 

[Odo]

Day 2 Vote Count 4

CP 3 - Chloe, Lethal, Ace
Lethal 1 - Magic
Xenus 2 - Big Man, Tweet
Phenom 2 - Barry, Gambit
Jeff 2 - Doddsy, CP
Tweet 1 - Xenus
Gambit 1 - Phenom

Deadline is 4:29am BST, anything after that won't be counted. 11 votes to lynch. Going to bed shortly ​

 

[CraigPelton]

Am I? Please elaborate, because all I’ve done so far is not agree with you. I saw how your posts had been misconstrued and moved my vote away from you, but now I don’t agree with you enough to want to vote Jeff, that’s a problem? I’m not sure which way I was manipulated and by whom and without that surety I’m not pushing either way. I don’t like your reaction to me just not agreeing with you though.

How could I possibly be manipulative here when everything I stated in response to Lethal's terrible case was verifiably true? You aren't dealing with the meat of the accusation against Jeff and neither did he. He just focused on me pointing out that he actually gave no reasons to vote me, he just listed stuff that happened and then voted me as if it added up to suspicion. It didn't. You're trying to "both sides" this when it's pretty clear-cut, and opening up yet another direction to split up town's focus today. We'll probably be heading toward another no lynch or rushing a lynch on someone for the sake of it because nobody is actually investing in any particular direction. Oh, except the 6 people who managed to find it in themselves to vote me over things that were demonstrably false to anyone who actually bothered to check.

 

[CraigPelton]

Having 7 wagons more than halfway into day 2 is not going to lead to anything good happening lmao

 

[Xenus]

How could I possibly be manipulative here when everything I stated in response to Lethal's terrible case was verifiably true? You aren't dealing with the meat of the accusation against Jeff and neither did he. He just focused on me pointing out that he actually gave no reasons to vote me, he just listed stuff that happened and then voted me as if it added up to suspicion. It didn't. You're trying to "both sides" this when it's pretty clear-cut, and opening up yet another direction to split up town's focus today. We'll probably be heading toward another no lynch or rushing a lynch on someone for the sake of it because nobody is actually investing in any particular direction. Oh, except the 6 people who managed to find it in themselves to vote me over things that were demonstrably false to anyone who actually bothered to check.

I wasn’t referring to you being manipulative, I was referring to who manipulated the facts to persuade me to vote for you and FWIW, I blame myself anyway as I should have checked. Realistically however there’s EV who couldve pointed out it wasn’t his question, Jeff who presumably knew that it was incorrect, lethal who made the initial point, Doddsy who pushed it along but didn’t throw a vote down due to a potential role.. I need to evaluate these things and don’t have the time to do it and I’m not going to throw my vote back behind someone else when it’s again based on someone else’s perception, because so far that’s served me pretty shittily you’ll agree yes?

 

[CraigPelton]

Hey @Jeff Valley Driver why did you like this post when you knew it was non-factual? It was your request, not EV's, and I did provide you my reads, a post which you liked. In fact, all throughout Lethal's series of incorrect posts about me, you didn't correct the record once despite being present and knowing he was wrong?

@Jeff Valley Driver Still looking for a reply to this friend

 

[Xenus]

Having 7 wagons more than halfway into day 2 is not going to lead to anything good happening lmao

What do you think about my points about Tweet? I’ve answered your points about Jeff and explained why I’m not voting and to be honest no one else is either so it’s clearly not as clear cut as you’re making out , but you’re right, we need a direction, so why not look at my direction I’m pushing?

 

[Tweet]

My point is you don’t actually shade me for anything. You keep saying you don’t feel good about me but don’t give any reasons. You seem to link me and Lethal with literally no evidence and have not once made any play based reason for the read. Considering you and I have not really interacted well, ever, you seem to be pretty confident in your seemingly gut read and I think you’re just doing stuff to keep busy and I’m struggling to understand why I’m the only one who sees it. I’ll quote evidence in a separate post cause phone

I made a reads list during n1 and below that I said why I feel bad about you. I made a post covering Lethal being similar to MTG, and that same post also had me feeling weird about Alco cause of colourgate. You came in very shortly after that post and reduced it to colourgate exclusively and we never got to talk about Lethal. So that's why I thought Lethal and you might be a team. And soon after that you began talking about infolynching me which nobody ever took seriously but it's still a massively thing to suggest, especially since it didn't even involve much talking to me or pushing me or regard any potential claim I might have. I already admitted this is partly OMGUS from my side but that's why I currently am not a fan of you.