Barry Presents: Whodunnit 2: The West Smithton Sagas GAME THREAD

[Poyser]

unvote
vote Poyser

So this little push of him on Mitch was dropped as soon as it started, which gets me back to thinking it was just another diversion.

Huh

 

[Canadian Dragon]

also Poyser, you were fucking confirmed in that game remember? not exactly apples to apples.

 

[Poyser]

also Poyser, you were fucking confirmed in that game remember? not exactly apples to apples.

I feel like you’re missing the point of what I’m saying, but this is a fair point that I’d forgotten tbh

 

[Kross Rhodes]

unvote
vote Poyser

So this little push of him on Mitch was dropped as soon as it started, which gets me back to thinking it was just another diversion.

Which is what I thought, but you don’t think your analysis holds up any longer? Since he’s not pushing?

 

[Odo]

Yes but I’m also a good player that is pretty good at catching people early on. My issue isn’t with him not following me btw, my issue is with him taking issue with it as in “would lynch poyser” based off of it when it’s something I regularly do as pointed out to Tweet last game and as he has said here as well. Not having played with someone as scum before isn’t going to stop me from trying to read them lol, that’s weird.

also I don’t have a scum lean on smark? Never said I did lol, my vote on him was a joke for making the same joke I did. Mitch is who I’m pushing

Yeah but being a good player weakens your argument because you aren’t factoring in that his posts generally look scummy anyway as he isn’t a high effort player, nor are you bothered that you don’t have a baseline to work from, which then makes your dependence on this point faulty when you use it to try to persuade other players

I would expect a good player to make reference to the fact they’ve no real idea what they’re looking for

 

[Tweet]

Huh

Mitch made another post which you haven't reacted to at all, if you were serious about pushing him I'd think you'd have tried to further your read on him from that.

 

[Tweet]

Which is what I thought, but you don’t think your analysis holds up any longer? Since he’s not pushing?

That's pretty much the jist of that post you quoted yea. Your question is?

 

[Poyser]

Yeah but being a good player weakens your argument because you aren’t factoring in that his posts generally look scummy anyway as he isn’t a high effort player, nor are you bothered that you don’t have a baseline to work from, which then makes your dependence on this point faulty when you use it to try to persuade other players

I would expect a good player to make reference to the fact they’ve no real idea what they’re looking for

Except I never do that so

 

[Poyser]

Mitch made another post which you haven't reacted to at all, if you were serious about pushing him I'd think you'd have tried to further your read on him from that.

Must have missed it lel

bit odd that you’re saying I’m not pushing him when I haven’t actually shown any intent to not push him tho

 

[Odo]

Then why aren’t you insistent on lynching skybox every game? I think if I look for evidence of you taking people’s tendencies into account, I’m not going to have to look for very long, so are you sure about that as a point of defence?

 

[Poyser]

Wait Mitch hasn’t made another post

His last post is just nothing, which was made around the time I voted for him

 

[Kross Rhodes]

That's pretty much the jist of that post you quoted yea. Your question is?

What you already answered, with a little bit of a kinda quick after already flipping from him to Mitch in the first place accusation-al tone.

 

[Daddy Deville]

This guy looks SHAKEN

 

[Banez]

Interesting that option 4, I saw something you didn’t didn’t come to mind

I only tell people they are terrible when they bring bullshit to a knife fight. New year, new me and all that

Well i'm not a good player like you so i didn't think you'd actually see something i would have coz i dont see anything.

 

[Poyser]

Then why aren’t you insistent on lynching skybox every game? I think if I look for evidence of you taking people’s tendencies into account, I’m not going to have to look for very long, so are you sure about that as a point of defence?

Because I have data as for what skybox does as scum, so it’s something I look for. Your point doesn’t make any sense. I’m saying I never make reference to the fact that I don’t know what I’m looking for when pushing a player or trying to get people to follow. With Mitch I don’t know what he does as scum so I’m making my own assumptions. The same way I pushed OMB the first time I played with him.

In any case I actually did just look back at mitch’s last two games. In both of those games he dropped a vote down early and had a scum read going into his first burst of posts. He had opinions. Contrast that with how he’s entered this game. Different, wouldn’t you say?