Randy Orton changes his gimmick every two or so years. Revisiting his first successful angle wouldn't hurt anymore than Evolution did.
Yeah because he would benefit so much now from beating up 70 year olds
Randy Orton changes his gimmick every two or so years. Revisiting his first successful angle wouldn't hurt anymore than Evolution did.
Yeah because he would benefit so much now from beating up 70 year olds
"What did Dusty do to these kids?":
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Slap yourself in the face right now. A legend doesn't have to be 70.
No, 65
Just in the ring right now is Goldust who can still wrestle and go. Seriously, I think you argue sometimes to just do it.
Just call them the Dustbusters.
Lol no. Goldust doesn't count. A full time competitor doesn't count as a legend unless you're triple h.
And I'm not the one who thinks that renewing an 8 year old gimmick is what's best for someone's career.
I'm kind of partial to "The Brother's Dust".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't put restrictions on who is or isn't a legend. It doesn't work like that.
And I didn't suggest anything, WWE brought it up and I said it would be awesome. And it's NO DIFFERENT than Evolution which is when he was that gimmick last.