• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


WWE Raw ~ 2.21.11 ????

PHX

Legacy Member
It's hard to believe WWE could be that dumb if they thought Sting could work a full schedule. Guess we'll see for sure in due time who this is.
 
wcf_sting_sig.png
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Sting just got taken off the TNA site as he was there on the 6th - http://www.tnawrestling.com/roster/superstar-roster - Nash was removed the day before the Rumble as well for what it is worth

It would be funny if it was WWE swerving and talking about how Undertaker and WWE can't hold WCW's legacy (Sting's goes hand and hand) down with that music choice.

I think the house holds the graves that HBK visited last year where he already had a plot with his name on it.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
I'm sticking with my original opinion of Sting personally. It is foolish on my part (insert smart ass comment here) but I do still feel like he is gone from TNA and coming to WWE.

On an unrelated note, I'm also calling The Rock as the WM host.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
While now I'm having doubt interestingly enough Sting has finally been removed from the TNA roster page.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Just noticed that after I posted it so oh well, lol. But anyways I mean there is a chance of it being a swerve but at the time being I'm fully expecting Taker to comeback possibly with his look being a little different or something.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Unless rumors about the western on his origins were true, I doubt he isn't the Deadman or ABA/Big Evil
 

Dale

Super Moderator
What I put in the Raw thread.

I'm not gonna say whether it's Sting or Taker, or someone else for that matter because I have no idea, but if it's not Sting then I don't understand why the WWE have run the video packages the way they have. It's not like the typical Undertaker package we've seen throughout the years, so if it does indeed turn out to be Taker then all they've done is get the IWC buzzing over a guy who will end up back in TNA.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
They also don't try to hide the fact that he is coming back either most of the time so this kind of throws me off from that regard.
 
Top