Jonathan said:
Sigh. The attitude era wasn't all it's made out to be.
There was a hell of a lot of bad wrestling, and for a wrestling fan like me, that's not a good thing.
Sure the Austin/McMahon feud was hilarious but you can't draw away from the fact that the wrestling then wasn't good at all.
It really grates on me when people are like: "OMG that attitude era was the best ever it was like so awesome!!!" - No, a part of it, was awesome.
If you watch wwe only for the wrestling then you should better change to mma or something like that. WWE is about entertainment, wrestling is only a part of it. Sure matches in the AE were HQ, but the amount of stars they had, the storylines created, the fantastic crowd, the gimmicks, the feuds made up for it.
Im pretty sure tyson kidd vs rey mysterio will be a better "wrestling" match than cena vs rock, however they arent the ones headlining wrestlemania, or ever will.
__________
BrockLesnarFanForLife said:
WWE needs to go back to the attiude era the PG era is killing WWE and I just cant stand how WWE is being all kiddy and lowering down the product to suit kids it sucks
i doubt its still the pg era.
WWE are doing a lot of things right, and the current era is much better than the pg era ever was.
Lots of heavyweight names in the mainevent like hhh rock taker cena lesner.
feuds without a title involved.
title feuds are interesting again, pun vs jericho wasnt all that bad, bryan's reign was classic. punk vs bryan after that, big show turning heel, everything was pretty great imo, they kept things fresh.
cena has evolved a lot, a lot more interesting segments with him, great feuds, mic skills increased hugely.
masked kane back.
having big names constantly coming back. rock, brock, hhh.
the only thing that needs to be done is to give some relevence to the lower card titles, aka the ic title, us title.
