- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 15
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 34
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, United States
First off, I have a high disdain for Roman. However after watching Bret Hart's wrestling with Shadows documentary last night I have some thoughts.
Maybe Roman could of worked if he was marketed different.
He's been marketed as "The Big Dog!"
Basically he's been pushed to be the guy. Who was "The guy" before him. The two biggest ones Cena and Hogan. Hart filled the roll for a bit. Austin and rock as well but they were attitude Era and that marched to the beat of its own drum.
Hogan, Bret and Cena all have something in common. They are the hero of the children.
What if instead of saying "here's the big dog" they said "here's the children's hero"?
What if they never adopted "The Big Dog" and gave him a moniker like "The Last Knight" and gave him the heart of a warrior?
Personally I can't stand Roman. However if it was pushed in the light like im suggesting, I think things could of been different.
Thoughts?
Maybe Roman could of worked if he was marketed different.
He's been marketed as "The Big Dog!"
Basically he's been pushed to be the guy. Who was "The guy" before him. The two biggest ones Cena and Hogan. Hart filled the roll for a bit. Austin and rock as well but they were attitude Era and that marched to the beat of its own drum.
Hogan, Bret and Cena all have something in common. They are the hero of the children.
What if instead of saying "here's the big dog" they said "here's the children's hero"?
What if they never adopted "The Big Dog" and gave him a moniker like "The Last Knight" and gave him the heart of a warrior?
Personally I can't stand Roman. However if it was pushed in the light like im suggesting, I think things could of been different.
Thoughts?