Should Superstars become a brand

[Sackfist]

There should be no brands in my opinion, but sayhing that, NXT is better than RAW and SD atm lmao..

:shock:

Crayo favoring NXT?

 

[Justin17]

Last week, Hawkins and Reks kidnapped him to convince Maxine to use her, um, "powers" to convince Regal to get off their backs, while Bateman and Kaitlyn found Striker tied up in the closet and freed him, for Striker to grab Hawkins's cane and weakly swear vengeance upon his kidnappers, as Maxine was ratting Hawkins and Reks out to Regal in hopes of getting a spot on Smackdown.

So next week, Bateman and Kaitlyn may be framed, or be treated as heroes. Regal may have special plans for Hawkins and Reks, Striker may go berserk on whoever he suspects kidnapped him, he may go back to being a full-time wrestler, you just don't know. And who knows with the Maxine and Regal stuff.

It may not be the most personal storyline out there, but it's an actual interesting cliffhanger for next week full of complex possibilities, something we haven't seen on Raw or Smackdown in years.

:facepalm:

 

[Leo C]

Superstars shouldn't become a third brand because NXT is already in that function nowadays.

My favorite thing on NXT is the Kidd vs McGillicutty feud atm.

 

[seabs]

:facepalm:

Try responding to him, he's made a strong argument there and replying with that basically makes you look like a tool.

 

[Justin17]

Try responding to him, he's made a strong argument there and replying with that basically makes you look like a tool.

:gusta:

 

[Hannah Bee]

Superstars isn't considered it's own brand. NXT is but that is because NXT actually puts out interesting content and feuds.

I mean that it's considered as a brand of the underpushed by Smarks.

And I agree! NXT's pretty exciting, than useless promos that does nothing for build up of feuds (eg. 3 Stooges). :