• Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


No money. More problems

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
33
Location
Sweden
Looks like TNA are in financial problems again.
Ck6gCOzWUAAKAJU.jpg


Slammiversary almost did not happen. Ouch
 

Roadster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
44,470
Reaction score
4,214
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
uUsHwHt
Favorite Wrestler
CVWSrPC
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
L1l4tIp
Damn, I wouldn't want TNA to go out of business because a lot of people will be jobless, but it's come to the point where they are in a constant struggle for survival. I think it would be best to sell the company off, and euthanize the TNA brand.
 

Wacokid27

The Dark Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
11,540
Reaction score
2,235
Points
0
Location
The Rock Ridge Jail
The biggest problem that TNA has is that Dixie apparently won't give up majority ownership, which has cost them more than a handful of investors.

I never hope for a company that employs people to go out of business, but this is the case where the owners see the answer, the answer's right there for them to take, but they just refuse to see what's in front of them.

wk
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
59,640
Reaction score
12,782
Points
118
The biggest problem that TNA has is that Dixie apparently won't give up majority ownership, which has cost them more than a handful of investors.

I never hope for a company that employs people to go out of business, but this is the case where the owners see the answer, the answer's right there for them to take, but they just refuse to see what's in front of them.

wk

Yeah it seems to be that she wants to keep majority ownership even if it results in TNA eventually going under. It's very counterproductive, obviously. If TNA does go under, then there's no majority ownership anyway