+John "Superman" Cena Or AJ Styles "Phenomenal ONE+

[chessarmy]

Wrestling is fake, this is the dumbest thread I've ever seen

 

[MizMasta3000]

NO! WRESTLING IS REAL :disgust1:!!!!

 

[G 3]

it's still real to me damnit

 

[noumenon]

The formula is this...

Cena >>>>> Everyone except for...

An angry HHH/returning HHH

or

@Mania then Taker > HBK >>> Everyone.. YET the unknown variable of Taker vs. Cena @ Mania to determine who is the king of squashes.

 

[seX-Power]

What would be the point of putting Cena over Taker at Mania unless they want to solidify an epic long term heel turn.

 

[adhyanta]

Anybody else thinks, except for his match against Sheamus, Cena performs better when he lost? Because then, he'd be forced to improvises... instead of doing the same routines. Cena has the worst routines!! The only thing he does good is lifting up opponents, that's it. Not throwing, or dropping, or slamming, just lifting.
AJ is better whem he wins. Always good, even when losing. The reason why he can be so great, is because the impacts of his offenses are weak. They drop people, not hurt them. That's why he's phenomenal.. he's forced to do phenominally so his wins made sense.
Who won? Cena. 'Cause his shirt sold more.

 

[MizMasta3000]

he is forced to improvises?

 

[adhyanta]

he is forced to improvises?

Because one of the reason I hate his routines, is because they're waaayy to powerful, that often, it made the outcome felt very dictated. Because when they are succesfully executed, the obligatory-show-of-damage demanded on his opponents, ridicilously limited the opponents freedom to wrestle... because their threat level had become devalued so much.. to the point that they ended up dangerous as a Scooby-Doo villain.