OMG you guys are insane. Bottom Line? Undertaker is better than Cena can ever hope to be. You know why? Because it was the fans choice to like Taker. Not the WWE cramming him down our throats. AND the Undertaker has been around for 17 years so his gimmick must have been working for somebody....AND he may have only a few moves but he pulls them off better than Cena does...AND his entrances and promos are supposed to be the way they are because thats his gimmick. Do you honestly believe Cena will be around for the next 20 yrs? Do you think he will be near as big of a legend that Taker is? No. He may be around but he came in after Taker had already been there long before and if there had been no Taker to help get WWE into the mainstream then there would never have been a John Cena. So some people need to think about the fact that the Undertaker is one of the reasons that the WWE is what it is and thats why you watch it.
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
I never get tired of undertakers moves like Last ride, Tombstone, Choke slam, Old school, and all his other moves. All of Cena's moves are boring and they look weak like Fu is just a drop to the side, 5 knuckle suffle is just a punch on the ground, STFU is just stupid hes not even suppose to be a good technical wrestler why does he even have a submission move?
the main reason people are turning on cena is this big ass title reign he has.
hell, i was a cena fan up until wrestlemania
hell, i was a cena fan up until wrestlemania
Travis40
Guest
Okay....I said it once, I'll say it 344,302 times. Cena does not decide how long his title rign lasts.
the dark knight
Guest
he can damn well ask vince to lose it day after day until he gets what he wants...
CenaMark54
Guest
Cena....
is Better on the mic
Has better matches
Gets bigger reactions
Draws people in
doesn't rely on gimmick matches.
....is better than taker
Now thats just ridiculous. Are you going to ask your boss for a demotion?
is Better on the mic
Has better matches
Gets bigger reactions
Draws people in
doesn't rely on gimmick matches.
....is better than taker
Now thats just ridiculous. Are you going to ask your boss for a demotion?
Cena gets booed and hes a face taker gets cheers all the time even if hes heel
He has 10x better matches than Cena
Taker has a way better gimmick.
He has 10x better matches than Cena
Taker has a way better gimmick.
Great One
Guest
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 31
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 31
the dark knight
Guest
nope. give both of them a mic and lets see what goes on...
just talking more on the mic and screaming doesn't mean you're good on the mic. if so, then batista's promo from last smackdown is the promo of the month.
no he doesnt. and teh only reason his matches were decent is because he faced opponents who can make a good match even if they wrestled their own arm.
you mean the booos? oh well....
oh yea, and taker got bigger reactions before the badass gimmick.
lol. taker stands next to hogan, hbk, bret hart, flair, stone cold and the rock when it comes to superstars who got more people to get in wrestling. cena? he's the reason why the wwe's losing more fans by the day.
doesnt mean he's butter.
keep dreaming.
yes i will. i'd do whats right for the business. plus, if im heel and get boooed that much, id quit wrestling. watch the video in my sig...
edit-
^He has improved
But he still sucks.
thats because he didnt get anywhere near the mic for the last couple of weeks.
I would NEVER ask for a demotion. Fuck whats good for the company or business, I gotta get my money.