Golden Era v New Era

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
683
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
I've recently been watching through some of the early WrestleMania's on the network and the question dawned on me.

Which Golden Era Stars / Main Eventers wouldn't even make the mid card of the new era in terms of ability and performance (Not Gimmick or Charisma)?

Granted different decade entirely and they popped for a drop toe hold back then but who in your mind was the most smoke and mirrors?

Golden Era Circa 1982-1993
New Era Circa 2016-Present
 

Roadster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
44,470
Reaction score
4,214
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
uUsHwHt
Favorite Wrestler
CVWSrPC
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
L1l4tIp
Warrior, Hercules Hernandez, Lex Luger.

It should be noted that so many of the talents from the Golden Era were playing up for the WWF crowd, and all of them were excellent workers. Hogan in AWA, Japan and Florida was excellent. He toned his style down, and focused on the power moves, over-the-top expressions and other cartoony aspects because that is what worked in the WWF (and generally worked for the market they tried getting).

That wasn't just an 80s WWF things either, WWF was known for having very basic matches even during the Vince Sr. days. Bruno Sammartino is an example of a guy whose matches in New York consisted of holds and a few big power moves, and were generally underwhelming for non-New York fans. However, Sammartino's matches outside the territory were totally different, and got a lot of universal praise.

Luger is the best of the bunch, and had the longevity that the other two didn't have. Neither of them were good to watch, and lived off their looks. The only good match in Warrior's career was against Hogan because Hogan led him through. Luger had some good matches, but most of his matches are a chore to watch. Hernandez was just a roid freak without an ounce of athleticism or ability in him.
 

Geese

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2017
Messages
4,677
Reaction score
4,853
Points
113
Favorite Wrestler
E3RY3ej
Favorite Wrestler
Y8A7yx1
Favorite Sports Team
sacramentokings
Favorite Sports Team
Rx1XOnt
Nailz comes to mind. All of his moves were illegal chokes and brawling. He was a one-note wonder: Once his feud with Big Bossman ended, that was the end of his run. Giant Gonzalez was a formidable threat to the Undertaker but wouldn't cut it in today's era. He chokes, put chloroform on a towel to suffocate his opponent. He had a drawn-out feud with Undertaker for eight months until their Rest in Peace match at Summer Slam '93. Fans would smarten up to his limitations in today's era.