Last night, at Genesis, ring announcer David Penzer referred to The Roode/Joe match as a "grudge match." Also, when Robert Roode took on Petey Williams at LockDown, it was considered a "grudge match." On the card as well, was the non-title, non-gimmick MCMG/Team 3-D match. Was it referred to as a "grudge match?" No. When I realized that after watching the PPV a second time, I just couldn't help but to think that it just plain 'ol made the MCMG match look bad. It's kinda like cutting down your own company's PPV match. Thoughts?
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Degrading Fueds?
- Thread starter JHar888
- Start date
Huh? MCMG made look bad? They WON the match, how could they look bad?!! Of course it's a grudge match, 3D slammed them thru tables in a previous impact! episode!!!
i still dont get it.
but thank you to everyone else who doesnt understand with me. i thought i was too high for a second.
but thank you to everyone else who doesnt understand with me. i thought i was too high for a second.
I am sorry if I sound negative but man who the hell cares what they call the matches they can call them single, grudge special whatever it still doesn’t change anything and MCMG didn’t look bad they went over probably the greatest tag team in the history of the industry and you care about what David Penzer announced the matches???
I never even thought about it like that grudge match normal match not to bothered what they call it
So you are saying TNA are degrading their feuds because of how Dave Penzer introduces them? As long as the match/feud is good I don't really care tbh.
Everyone, everyone. Here's to making a long story short:
Roode/Williams is a "grudge match."
MCMG/3-D is a match "scheduled for one fall."
My point is, what's the difference?
There is no difference. One match is named under one title and the other is named under another. They are both grudge matches and scheduled for 1 fall but it doesn't matter if it is announced that way or not. You always gotta make big deals outta little things...
xtremebadass
Guest
So calling the sucky match a grudge match and calling a better match nothing makes the better match look bad? IMO, it doesn't matter what the match is called, all that matters is the match itself. Names go in the same category as hype, when it comes down to it, all that matters is the actual match.