Nobody is credible enough to face Brock Lesnar. If they have no one to go up against him, why did they put the title on him?
Sounds like the first legitimate underdog story in years, but to each their own. Heyman can get it over.
It's funny I think. People imagined a Brock reign of terror, but ended up with more Cena than bargained for. I'm hoping that people realize now with the benefit of hindsight that they should be careful of what they ask for. Brock vs. Cena was only going to lead to one thing... the same old road to redemption crap which WWE is gonna spin on us until we believe it. Special attraction? 3 1/2 matches in 2014 barely sounds like an attraction at all.
I'd blame the Bryan injury and WWE's ridiculous lack of roster depth for the Cena crap than anything else. When Bryan had to be stripped of the title, they didn't have any other option besides doing Brock/Cena II (fine, III you history buffs). Nothing would have drawn the interest, nothing would created the interest from the fanbase than Brock getting his revenge from that bullshit loss 2 years ago.
Right now, I think Majour put it best. While we may not like Brock Lesnar being champion, there's really no better option. That's the biggest issue going on right now, and at Wrestlemania, this Lesnar title reign HAS to be used to help solve that problem. For right now... we (kinda) have a grudge match in the main event of the PPV which is pretty damned refreshing. Not sure how much they can keep it up but I'll take it!