I always read that but I also just read that Raw's climbing back up from 2.0 to 2.2 this summer. Which isn't much but last year they weren't doing any better.. of course when you look at it over the years, the last time they averaged a 3 mil throughout the whole year was 2013.
I'm not just talking about ratings...I'm talking about every number...
Crowd attendance (live & house shows), Network Subscriptions,
Merchandise sales, social media and TV ratings...all the "numbers"
I mean the WWE has stated that TV numbers aren't really that
important...but when the TV contracts need to be renewed...who
knows what the WWE will start saying.
Me personally as a wrestling fan...I just want good to great matches
with a "clean" finish.
A winner, a loser, some proper story progression.
I want some interesting stories about interesting characters where
I can be invested in who actually gets to win.
I'll watch who I want and ignore who I want and I'm free to make
that choice.
But...I'm an overseas fan who watches all the matches he wants
online and buys the pay per view dvds as they come out through
the year.
In the grand scheme of things...I don't really matter to the WWE.
I know this...and I understand it.
Its the fans in the United States, Canada & the United Kingdom
who will attend the shows, pay for the network and buy the merch
that really matter.
(I just want to state I would buy WWE merch if I could find anything
else besides Roman Reigns T-Shirts and action figures...just saying...
Although I do have a nice collection of WWE pop vinyls...all female
performers of course)
When all those "numbers" continue to drop and more people walk away
from the product...what does the WWE do then?
Back at the start of the Monday Night Wars...the WWE had to change
and evolve to compete with WCW and that evolution gave rise to the
most successful era in the companies history.
All I'm saying is the wrestling can be given a 5 (or 6) star rating...but the
"general audience" needs a story to be invested in the actual wrestling.
Look at Game of Thrones as an example...a story filled with complex
characters all with their own motivations and goals...but...at the end
of the day...there are heroes...and there are villains.
We want to see the heroes triumph and the villains fail (and die for
the most part).
Is there a "moral grey area"? Of course there is...but the WWE is
not Game of Thrones...and perhaps the most simple and direct
approach is better for wrestling as a story telling medium.
Give us a hero to cheer for...and give us a villain to hate...and the
audience can get invested...they can pick a side...they can actually
care about the story being told...instead of just cheering because
two giant men are beating the shit out of each other.
Anyone can go to a bar and watch two drunk idiots do that.
Of course may-be I'm just old fashioned...