Search results

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


  1. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    How absolutely accurate.
  2. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    "Radical" eh? I think of it more as, "investing in the fanbase's interests".
  3. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    Oh yes, how could I have forgotten about 60% of WWE's viewers. It's a shame really, but it's the world we live in...
  4. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    Haha, perhaps put enough effort into a rivalry that the audience would at least care enough to watch it. A mid card rivalry but keep it at least moderately interesting, but I suppose that's too much to ask for these days.
  5. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    I agree, in the direction that the company is heading, less title belts is inevitable.
  6. Vice

    Brand Irrelevancy?

    Okay, so as you should already know, the WWE Title and World Heavyweight Title is set to be unified at TLC. I feel like this is a step in the wrong direction, for many reasons but particularly due to the fact that being on a brand means almost nothing anymore. This may not mean much to some but...
Top Bottom