Early Rumored Card For WWE's WrestleMania 29 PPV

[SAIYANS]

Cena could have a total respect feud with Taker. They can play into how their relationship evolved from Taker shaking his hand, to Cena pissing on his grave and rapping about him, to now where he has the utmost respect for him and wanting to go one on one with the man that rules mania

It can be easy to do with a face Cena, better actually if they reach back to their past years ago

 

[PHX]

Would be the most stacked mania card ever if they did that but this is obviously just making a report out of internet assumptions. I'm kind of split though cause since Rock said he wants to go after the WWE title I kind of want Punk to be the guy who is champ by then. I think their feud could be pretty damn good. Same time I really want Punk/Austin since they can do so much with that feud. Rock/Brock would be huge from a standpoint of money for WWE but as Cerbs said their feud wasn't exactly anything special the first time years ago. Would kind of hate the idea of the world title being in a match with two guys who aren't full time guys.

 

[Rated R Superstar]

I don't see anything wrong with Rock and Brock challenging for the title. Honestly, both of them left just before their prime, and it could mean they could stick around a bit longer. I'm game for it.

 

[PHX]

Doesn't make sense though cause think about it Brock's contract is like a 30-40 date contract for the whole year meaning your world champion isn't gonna be there for all the shows, isn't gonna work house shows, etc. That's weird for a WWE champion. Having a WWE title match between two guys who you aren't exactly sure are gonna still be around after mania is just a awkward situation.

 

[TheGoldStandard]

I think we will get a Heel Cena....No one thought we would get a Heel Hogan and we did and it was awesome

 

[Smartmark]

The only match out of those rumored only Stone Cold Vs Punk would be a match I would watch.

If Cena is to end Taker's streak, WWE is dead

 

[Dale]

Doesn't make sense though cause think about it Brock's contract is like a 30-40 date contract for the whole year meaning your world champion isn't gonna be there for all the shows, isn't gonna work house shows, etc. That's weird for a WWE champion. Having a WWE title match between two guys who you aren't exactly sure are gonna still be around after mania is just a awkward situation.

That's the big snag about either Rock/Brock becoming champion. I would imagine that either of the two guys could win the belt at the Rumble given how much they'll be then appearing on TV to build up towards Mania. If I was to throw a wild guess out, I would say that one wins the Rumble and the other wins the belt at the Rumble. The champion then defends it inside the Elimination chamber?

As far as Taker/Cena goes you could have Taker initiate this feud. He talks that throughout the years whether it's been at Mania or any other show, he's beaten the best that this company has had to offer. Would be amazing to then have him go off on a Jericho style tirade where he lists endless amounts of guys who he's beaten, all but one man and that's John Cena.

 

[SAIYANS]

Ausyin can't take the gts or ruhning knee I don't think. Least he shouldn't risk it. I see no way for punk to win their match then as Austin ain't tapping for him

 

[John McHenry]

I call Shenanigans. I'd hope to god wwe wouldn't make brock vs. rock for a title. I mean neither of these are full time guys so while it helps the belt hurts most of the roster.

I'd love to see Austin Punk but that's iffy.

While I'm sure we'll unfortunately see Taker Cena some day I'm thinking it'd be at WM 30 I also think that may be takers last mania.

 

[PHX]

Ausyin can't take the gts or ruhning knee I don't think. Least he shouldn't risk it. I see no way for punk to win their match then as Austin ain't tapping for him

I'm sure Punk could do it to where it would make sure Austin was safe. Punk knows what he's doing out there and don't think Austin would have interest in facing him if he didn't think Punk couldn't handle it. Based on what Austin has been saying about his neck don't think he'll be as fragile as we would assume.

 

[The New F'n Show]

I'd be fine with all three of these matches but I don't think Brock-Rock should be a title match. Just doesn't need it.

 

[SAIYANS]

I want Rock and Brock for the title because it will make that damn belt truly mean something like it did at 17, 18, 22, and so on. I mean the last time the WWE title was highly fought over on a huge stage by elite talent, while being the main center piece of the feud, was what Cena v HBK at 23? Do it for the prestige of the title. Rock and Brock both want it, the mega movie and mma stars respectively, former champs, it just makes the title look that much more important and like the grand prize in all of wrestling which is what the WWF/E title was meant to be.

No more of this Miz v Cena shit where the title is second fiddle. No more of this Jericho vs Punk shit where one guy is an obvious jobber to the stars and upper midcard - transition guy. No more family feud shit where it barely gets mentioned like Orton v HHH. No more throw away triple threat with weak booing like Cena v Orton v HHH.

Give me Brock saying he is the best damn champ in history. Give me Rock saying he wants the belt back that he fought the likes of Taker, Austin and HHH fir while bleeding and crying. Make that damn belt the biggest prize it is. The best chance to do that is those two men who have transcended the genre and can touch the masses.

Roster got a problem with it ... tell them bust their ass and get noticed to the point the blow up over night. Tell them to draw and sell enough. They can't do that, tell them to stop being a pussy and put their feelings in their fucking wallet as they damn sure will happily cash their check off Rock vs Brock despite how they feel.

 

[PHX]

WWE proved they can make the WWE title seem valuable as hell without having to star stack it just to make it seem that way with the Punk/Cena feud which was the most important the WWE title seemed in a long time. Just wasn't at mania.

Your point is valid as to why the match should happen just still would bother me at the end of the day that it would be between 2 guys we know aren't there long term and in reality wouldn't need the title for their match to be a big deal.

 

[AF.]

Austin vs Punk does not interest me at all. The other 2 matches do though.

 

[rcoot93]

Im happy with all the matches but I would put off Austin v punk another year and possibly hold off cena v undertaker, also I always thought if that matc were to hapen cena would win but after his lose to the rock i might change my mind