The money in the bank match not being at wrestlemania is positive?
Not really, no. But it would be nice to see some constructive reasoning as to why you don't like this news.
Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk
The money in the bank match not being at wrestlemania is positive?
They don't have time for the MiTB match, a Diva's Title, US Title and tag title matches because HHH/Undertaker need 2.5 hours to wrestle their one star classic.
Now your going to tell me that their WM 27 match was bad
It wasn't among my favourite matches of the year but I wouldn't go as far as to say it was bad.
I agree with Fuji.
The match was decent, but certainly not worthy of a rematch at this year's Wrestlemania. I believe WWE officials are well aware of this, hence the addition of the Hell in a Cell.
Hell In A Cell is to up the suspense.
I get that, but it doesn't change the fact that Undertaker is winning.
WWE is really making me think that Hunter might win. I guess that's a good thing.
Who cares what people think. Undertaker will probably retire after this wrestlemania
Who cares what people think. Undertaker will probably retire after this wrestlemania
He can't even sit up after a match now as it is, Mark seriously needs to retire before he gets in real bad shape.The people I'm referring to are people who work backstage, including the wrestlers, so clearly its important to care what they think since their the one's with intimate knowledge of the situation.
However I'd be perfectly happy if 'Taker retired after 'Mania. In fact I'd be ecstatic.