WWE Magazine’s Undertaker Streak Error!

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Super Saiyan Goku

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
12,001
Reaction score
842
Points
0
Age
33
The May issue of WWE Magazine contains a feature looking at “31 Bold Predictions for Wrestlemania 31.” It’s interesting to note that #22, which you can view below, reads:

“Twenty-two Superstars have fallen to Undertaker’s Streak, but one duo will try to stack the odds.”

9Zs8S6a.jpg


Source: http://www.sescoops.com/wwe-magazines-undertaker-streak-error-nba-star-upset-streak-ending/

:hmm: I KNEW IT! I KNEW IT WAS A BAD NIGHTMADE! :yay:
 

Roadster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
44,470
Reaction score
4,214
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
uUsHwHt
Favorite Wrestler
CVWSrPC
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
L1l4tIp
Probably because it was written or edited before the match.
 

Just Kevin

All I can be is just Me!
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
22,799
Reaction score
6,026
Points
113
Age
47
Location
North Carolina, United States
It was meant as a joke.. meaning since all these individuals could not break the streak maybe a duo (2on1) could. The writers of the magazine had no clue what the outcome of the Lesnar/Taker match was going to be obviously and it was written before the match took place. Fanboys reading too much into things again.
 

iron9567

Jobber
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
29
Reaction score
11
Points
0
Age
39
It's a conspirecy because Super Cena was the one that was suppose to end the streak when he turned heel at WM.

Note the sarcasm...

I think that it was one of those things were there is a lot of stuff being added into the magazine and that little nugget just slipped past the editor. Since no one knew besides a select few knew what the match result. So the writers for this article assumed that the match was going to end like we were so used to having the Undertaker win. That they just ended up going with this assumption with their article. This predictability with the matches is the reason why they needed to end the streak. I think that they should have done it sooner in my opinion. I would have to think a bit more on who I think that should have ended the streak.
thanks
Iron Man
 
  • Like
Reactions: seabs

Senhor Perfect

Bulletproof
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
21,401
Reaction score
6,655
Points
0
Location
Nibelheim
You're all wrong. One of his victories was in a handicap match. So it was 22 superstars that had failed before BARACK LESNARRRR!!!!!
 

The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
37
You're all wrong. One of his victories was in a handicap match. So it was 22 superstars that had failed before BARACK LESNARRRR!!!!!


Technically, when you consider that he fought both Kane and Shawn Michaels twice and Triple H three times, it was only eighteen different superstars that he conquered.
 

Nero_x3

The Architect
Banned
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
3,663
Reaction score
617
Points
0
Yes it is 22 superstars, he faced Big Show and A Train at Wrestlemania 19. However, it's not actually 22 people. He faced HHH 3 times, HBK twice, Kane twice, and then the others come in.