Wrestler Rating Series #12 - Hulk Hogan

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


How would you rate Hogan as an overall wrestler on a scale 1-10?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.

white crow

The Serbian Butcher
Hotshot
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
4,338
Reaction score
562
Points
0
Location
Serbia
giphy.gif

The Hulkamaniac! I consider this guy to be one of the most overrated wrestlers in the history of the bussines but let's see what the WWEF crew and Crow fully thinks.

His in-ring skills were strongly below average. I mean, he had one of the most boring movesets out there and it wasn't the case because of persona or anything, he simply wasn't able to perform anything better. He even made a simple legdrop look bad, and the other moves he was performing were basically what rookie first learns when becoming a wrestler. Some of Hogan's matches earned a very good reputation but all that was is because of other things, not necessarily wrestling(charisma, character work, presentation). I honestly think that 80% of 80s and 90s locker room would be able to do exact same what he did in-ring but significantly better. He was a powerhouse with very limited moveset and still botching from time to time. Only thing he was able to do decently was grappling, he even sometimes made it look above average but it was mostly a typical big guy skill he performed in a non-special way. Even among powerhouses solely, Hogan was still below average overall and an ok grappling didn't help at all. Not to even mention technician skills, he was down right terrible at that. His striking, excluding the cringy taunts in between, was really unbeliavable looking, it was just visibly fake and not even entertaining to watch. Even Moxley in WWE was a better striker, and we all know how shitty he was.

When we bring out charisma it is important to mention the WWE presentation of him. Basically if they put an other guy his size out there and gave him an exact same attire, reaction would be the same. Crowd will cheer for nearly every Vinnie Mac face of the company if you just give him a nice presentation and boring typical persona for that which average wrestling fans(marks) generally like. The only very good wrestling quality of Hogan are the mic skills. Let's face it, there is no denying that the Hulkster knew his thing during promos no matter how generally boring his character work was. One of those guys with boring text to say but still said perfectly right, if that makes any sense. I'm not saying that I liked his promos subjectively, but they really were executed nearly perfectly. Speaking of character work, it was really one of the worst in history. 80s Hogan was a snooze fest. It's like a very lame generic superhero persona that no-one who trully knows wrestling likes. I know 80s and early 90s weren't really creative when it comes to that, but superhero shirt-ripping Hogan was the cringiest shit of that century that I've seen. Anyways, Hollywood Hogan was the first good character that he pulled up. It actually had a decent heel heat to it, the real crowd reaction, not the one where marks and pre-puberty kids cheer for their yellow superhero. That heel role perfectly suited him at the time, it was genuinely entertaining to watch. I still wouldn't say main-event entertaining but for the first time he really compensated for his lack of in-ring ability. He still wasn't the best thing of NWO in my opinion but I still liked him there. Was Hogan a good babyface? In my opinion hell no. I don't really count mark and kids' reactions to a face persona that incredibly sucked, and I don't think die-hard wrestling fans of the time could possibly like that charade. Was Hogan a good heel? Definetely yes. His first and only role that I liked.

My honest grade for Hogan is 5/10, and it's a very weak 5. He just sucked in-ring and didn't really compensate enough in other fields. Pushing Reigns to the top is far better decision than pushing Hulkster, it really looks far less bad overall. The one and only thing that Hogan ever did above average was the heel role, literally everything else was at best average and a big percentage of it significantly below average. In short, one of the worst main-eventers in the history of WWE.

Let us hear what you think about this wrestler in a comment and cast a vote in the poll if you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solidus1

bullyballmm

babeball
Main Eventer
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
16,475
Reaction score
1,481
Points
0
Age
30
Location
AU
6/10

I had to stop myself for a second from giving him a lower score just because how I feel about it re: his ego and his politicking backstage, and his bigotry.

So many people are better wrestlers than him. Freaking James Ellsworth is better in-ring.

But his character work is top-notch, his promo ability is golden, he knows how to work a crowd, knows how to get them hyped up in a match etc. And his given us some great moments ("Don't work yourself into a sheet", "This is what you call a RAGSHEET, brother!", that Yapapi strap match thing). He is well-known is wrestling and beyond for a reason, and that's because he is larger than life like SCSA and The Rock
 
  • Like
Reactions: white crow

Geese

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2017
Messages
5,012
Reaction score
5,164
Points
113
Favorite Wrestler
E3RY3ej
Favorite Wrestler
Y8A7yx1
Favorite Sports Team
sacramentokings
Favorite Sports Team
Rx1XOnt
I consider this guy to be one of the most overrated wrestlers in the history of the business but let's see what the WWEF crew and Crow fully thinks.

His in-ring skills were strongly below average. I mean, he had one of the most boring movesets out there and it wasn't the case because of persona or anything, he simply wasn't able to perform anything better. He even made a simple legdrop look bad, and the other moves he was performing were basically what rookie first learns when becoming a wrestler. Some of Hogan's matches earned a very good reputation but all that was is because of other things, not necessarily wrestling(charisma, character work, presentation). I honestly think that 80% of 80s and 90s locker room would be able to do exact same what he did in-ring but significantly better. He was a powerhouse with very limited moveset and still botching from time to time. Only thing he was able to do decently was grappling, he even sometimes made it look above average but it was mostly a typical big guy skill he performed in a non-special way. Even among powerhouses solely, Hogan was still below average overall and an ok grappling didn't help at all. Not to even mention technician skills, he was down right terrible at that. His striking, excluding the cringy taunts in between, was really unbeliavable looking, it was just visibly fake and not even entertaining to watch.

When we bring out charisma it is important to mention the WWE presentation of him. Basically if they put an other guy his size out there and gave him an exact same attire, reaction would be the same. Crowd will cheer for nearly every Vinnie Mac face of the company if you just give him a nice presentation and boring typical persona for that which average wrestling fans(marks) generally like. The only very good wrestling quality of Hogan are the mic skills. Let's face it, there is no denying that the Hulkster knew his thing during promos no matter how generally boring his character work was. One of those guys with boring text to say but still said perfectly right, if that makes any sense. I'm not saying that I liked his promos subjectively, but they really were executed nearly perfectly. Speaking of character work, it was really one of the worst in history. 80s Hogan was a snooze fest. It's like a very lame generic superhero persona that no-one who trully knows wrestling likes. I know 80s and early 90s weren't really creative when it comes to that, but superhero shirt-ripping Hogan was the cringiest shit of that century that I've seen. Anyways, Hollywood Hogan was the first good character that he pulled up. It actually had a decent heel heat to it, the real crowd reaction, not the one where marks and pre-puberty kids cheer for their yellow superhero. That heel role perfectly suited him at the time, it was genuinely entertaining to watch. I still wouldn't say main-event entertaining but for the first time he really compensated for his lack of in-ring ability. He still wasn't the best thing of NWO in my opinion but I still liked him there. Was Hogan a good babyface? In my opinion hell no. I don't really count mark and kids' reactions to a face persona that incredibly sucked, and I don't think die-hard wrestling fans of the time could possibly like that charade. Was Hogan a good heel? Definetely yes. His first and only role that I liked.

He just sucked in-ring and didn't really compensate enough in other fields. Pushing Reigns to the top is far better decision than pushing Hulkster, it really looks far less bad overall. The one and only thing that Hogan ever did above average was the heel role, literally everything else was at best average and a big percentage of it significantly below average. In short, one of the worst main-eventers in the history of WWE.

Wrestlers who worked with Hogan would disagree with you as they felt he was a pretty good wrestler. He was no Lou Thesz in the ring, but he far from sucked as his simplified moves was conjured up by Vince McMahon. That simplified form of wrestling has always been the WWE's style so that's not Hogan's fault. Punch, boot to the face, hulk-up, and atomic legdrop. He wasn't going to wrestle a Nick Bockwinkel vs. Curt Hennig 60-minute classic because that is not the way the WWF did business at the time because Vince felt that type of long, drawn-out match didn't draw a crowd.

Dan Spivey complimented The Hulkster as a pretty good wrestler and said he carried that match against Ultimate Warrior in Wrestlemania VI. In the 80's, Hogan was hot in Japan and the AWA which is why Vince McMahon brought him to the WWF to beat the Iron Sheik for the title. He was the perfect fit as the mystery third man in Scott Hall and Kevin Nash's match against Sting, Randy Savage, Lex Luger.

When I was a kid, Hogan was not my favorite but I gotta give The Hulkster his due and say he gets the score of a 10 out of 10.
 

white crow

The Serbian Butcher
Hotshot
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
4,338
Reaction score
562
Points
0
Location
Serbia
Wrestlers who worked with Hogan would disagree with you as they felt he was a pretty good wrestler. He was no Lou Thesz in the ring, but he far from sucked as his simplified moves was conjured up by Vince McMahon. That simplified form of wrestling has always been the WWE's style so that's not Hogan's fault. Punch, boot to the face, hulk-up, and atomic legdrop. He wasn't going to wrestle a Nick Bockwinkel vs. Curt Hennig 60-minute classic because that is not the way the WWF did business at the time because Vince felt that type of long, drawn-out match didn't draw a crowd.

Dan Spivey complimented The Hulkster as a pretty good wrestler and said he carried that match against Ultimate Warrior in Wrestlemania VI. In the 80's, Hogan was hot in Japan and the AWA which is why Vince McMahon brought him to the WWF to beat the Iron Sheik for the title. He was the perfect fit as the mystery third man in Scott Hall and Kevin Nash's match against Sting, Randy Savage, Lex Luger.

When I was a kid, Hogan was not my favorite but I gotta give The Hulkster his due and say he gets the score of a 10 out of 10.
Ye, I strongly disagree but respect your opinion anyways. For me Hogan is the picture of everything wrong with WWE, he makes Reigns look like Daniel Bryan. I’ve never in my life seen a good Hulk Hogan match no matter who he was wrestling against, he just spoiled everything. Good wrestler? Hell no. No matter how good he was in non-wrestling abilities he just doesn’t compensate for complete shit of an in-ring skill. He’s not like The Rock who was average in-ring and GOAT of every other skill, nor like Stone Cold who was mostly above average in-ring and one of the GOATS in every other skill. Those two guys are probably 10 or a 9, but it’s a ridicule of a sport to put Hogan in the same sentence with them because he just didn’t compensate for lack of in-ring skill and was miles inferior to them two in every aspect. Contrary to popular opinion, The Rock and Stone Cold were good in-ring, both had a lot of 5 star matches unlike Hogan as well as certain wrestling skills that were strongly above average (Stone Cold - Brawling, technique, The Rock - grappling). Especially Stone Cold, he was a decent technician before the “Stone Cold” persona and had that skill always, no matter how utilized it was getting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geese

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Chicago
8/10. Why? Well love him or hate him, the dude put WWE on the map. He carried it. Sure, other talent helped, but Hogan made it bigger. Nobody was quite like him.

Hogan can actually wrestle. He just got pushed into this 5 moves of doom shit even worse than Cena did.

I wanted to give him a 6/10, but I gave him and 8 simply because Hulkamania ran wild for years, the atmosphere, and entertainment value of the guy can only be rivaled by guys like the rock, stone cold, or punk.